Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer, and investigative journalist, who has been producing television programs, documentaries, music videos, TV commercials, and stage plays for over thirty-five years, starting at the age of eighteen, hosting his own television talk show. Sibrel has owned five video production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks, worked as a television news reporter, and produced videos shown on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, TLC, USA, and BET. Sibrel has also appeared as a seasoned actor on the stage and screen over five hundred times. Articles featuring Sibrel's films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and USA Today. His awards from the American Motion Picture Society include Best Cinematography, Best Editing, and Top Ten Director.
Sibrel grew up as the biggest fan of the purported "moon landings", yet gradually began to recognize their unfortunate falsification. In Sibrel's mind, as well as many others, the claim that NASA walked on the moon on the very first attempt with 1960's technology, which only had one-millionth the computing power of a cell phone, when today with five decades of better technology NASA can only send astronauts one-thousandth the distance to the moon, simply defies logic. Sibrel believes that a religious attachment to the emotional event is what prevents people from waking up to the deplorable reality.
Bart Sibrel has appeared as guest commentator about the moon landing fraud and to discuss his films “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” and “Astronauts Gone Wild” on NBC, FOX, CNN, HBO, Geraldo, The Daily Show, The Abrams Report, and Coast to Coast. In his memoir Moon Man Bart Sibrel reveals, for the very first time, the official CIA code name for the real Apollo project, the military base where the first staged "moon landing" was filmed, and the names of fifteen United States government scientists and officials who were in attendance for the first moon landing falsification, some of whom are still alive today. This information was given to Sibrel by the Chief of Security of this secretive military base, who confessed his regrettable participation in this government fraud on his deathbed.
Moon Man also reveals Bart Sibrel's real-life espionage adventures investigating the CIA's greatest secret, including his discovery of privately recorded audio of an astronaut plotting Sibrel's assassination by the CIA, which would not be necessary if they really went to the moon. Bart Sibrel is convinced that until the moon landing fraud is exposed, all the governments of the world will continue to rob the people under their care of not only the truth, yet also of their hard earned money, which continues to this day to finance their own deception.
Reviewed in the United States on September 17, 2021
Verified Purchase
As a 24 year USAF veteran, I wish it were not so. Bart provides so
much proof the landings were faked, it is overwhelming. In a way, after
of 50 years of inability to return to the Moon, it seems more
implausible that we were able to go--six times on a slide rule--than
these events simply being staged.
After following Bart's evidence
to the logical conclusion, I find that even more smoking guns emerge.
The fact is, this was hard if not impossible to fake, and NASA,
surprisingly, perhaps because they were rushed, did a poor job faking
the missions. There are astonishing mistakes. Bart does an excellent
job documenting a large number of mistakes, but there are more.
A
handful of problems that I find impossible to dismiss are listed,
below. Some follow Bart's revelations a little farther, and a few are
different.
1. No gravity on the trip to the Moon and back. As
an Aerospace Engineer and USAF pilot for 20+ years, I do understand the
physics of weightlessness in orbit. Apparently, the orchestrators of
these missions missed that class. Namely, that weightlessness only
occurs in planetary orbit, it is an artifact of falling at the same
speed as the curvature of the planet, below, falls away from you. The
typical classroom thought experiment envisions shooting a canon. The
farther you shoot, the farther the shell travels as it falls. If you
shoot far enough, you'll actually hit yourself, as the shell circles the
Earth. Shoot even farther and it'll complete more than one orbit.
Shoot at just the right rate, and the shell will fall at the exact rate
the Earth's surface curves away, and the shell will go into orbit. That
constant falling is why an orbiting spacecraft feels "weightless." But
on a trip, radially away from Earth toward the Moon, the astronauts
will absolutely feel some weight. Yet, Aldrin does several experiments
demonstrating weightlessness, half way between the Earth and Moon, even
showing the Earth as a full globe out the window which Bart beautifully
debunks as a portion of the Earth's surface, filmed while in orbit,
shaped by the circular port hole window. The demonstration of
weightlessness actually proves the astronauts were in Earth orbit, not
half way to the Moon. The weightless experiments, broadcast on live TV,
do prove beyond ANY doubt the missions were fraudulent.
2.
Related to 1. Because NASA decided to use a simple optical trick to
make the Earth look far away while actually in orbit (by moving the
camera back from the circular window, as Bart proves with uncovered film
of the astronauts discussing the illusion), something impossible is
recorded for all of posterity. This is another, indisputable, smoking
gun, and its on NASA's own film reels for all to see. Bart ingeniously
points out their "round Earth" is just a view through a "soda straw" of
the port hole window. But this method has a major flaw, it takes a
small circular portion of the Earth's surface, and presents it as the
full diameter. Back then, we didn't routinely see satellite views of
the entire diameter of the Earth, but today, it's commonplace. We now
understand that the largest storms are around 200 miles wide, compared
to the Earth's 8,000 mile diameter. Tiny, by comparison.
Sure
enough, the actual Apollo 11 film footage from this event shows single
clouds spanning the entire diameter of the Earth, an absurd image for
today's satellite-savvy audience to swallow. Specifically, there is a V
shaped cloud that spans the entire planetary diameter. Utterly
impossible, and it proves Bart is right, this is a fraud, without any
doubt. Whatsoever.
You can see the footage of the astronauts
discussing the fake on Bart's links, which he provides in the book.
Better still, you can see the resulting NASA high res film footage of
the fake globe with 8,000 mile long clouds by searching:
"Apollo 11 - Unscheduled TV - 010:32:36 GET"
I
could go on, and on, and on, and on, with hundreds more inexcusable
errors illuminated by Bart and others. But just a few more:
3.
The lack of a blast crater under the Lunar Lander after it fired its
10,000 lb rocket motor directly into the dust caked Moon surface from
just a few feet away. On the Moon, that's almost 2,000 lbs of raw
thrust, the same as a supersonic T-38 jet engine, at full power, pointed
straight down into dust/regolith, dust that the astronauts later kick
around like sand on a beach. Absurd. Imagine pointing a supersonic
jet's engine straight into sand on a beach at point blank range. Now do
it with 5/6ths less gravity, without disturbing a single grain of sand.
4. The Lunar Module landing film's lack of communication delay. Search:
"Apollo 11 landing from PDI to Touchdown"
For
a short time, when communications get heated, the time delay between
Houston and the Lander, caused by relatively slow radio waves traveling
220,000 miles at the speed of light's tortoise-like 186,000/second,
completely disappears. They talk and respond like they are next door.
5.
As a former USAF pilot, I know how hard manual aircraft rejoins are,
finding, then joining two aircraft in formation. Its a skill that takes
many years to develop and master. Joining the Lunar module with the
Lunar Orbiter, using launch timing from a wind-up wrist watch, at 4000
mph, in the vastness of space, visually, from an entirely unknown launch
angle based on how the lander settled, with no horizon reference, no
air to brake you, with very limited miniature thrusters, in 1/6th
gravity, is BEYOND ridiculous. Six times, without a hitch. No.
6.
Better communication clarity than my cell phone, from the Moon. Sprint
has a lot to learn. NASA was used to corded phone lines, they had no
idea how hard it would be to call someone wirelessly, crystal clearly,
even on our own planet.
And of course...
7. SpaceX blowing
up hundreds of rockets trying to land on their tail using super
computers, high speed GPS tracking, and ring laser gyro stabilization,
inputting thousands of computer calculated corrections per second. Its
very hard to do with todays technology. But Armstrong did it, fully
manually, in a totally unfamiliar gravity paradigm... first try. As did
every other Apollo mission. No. Sorry. We know better, now. SpaceX
isn't THAT incompetent (although they have asked for 8 years more time
to (re)invent a super simple Lunar Lander).
8 through n... Bart
shows the depressing behavior of the post mission astronauts press
events, their unanimous inability to remember if they could see stars
from the Moon's surface, their complete unfamiliarity with the Van Allen
problem, so many photos with major problems, the ability of film to
survive +220F, -220F temperatures and the unshielded radiation of space,
surviving the hail of 25,000 mph micrometeorites on the Moon's fully
unprotected surface, the lack of any bad photos with manual
focus-aperture-shutter speed and no viewfinder, orange juice literally
squirting through the vacuum of space, puffs of wind waving the flag on
the Moon as an astronaut runs a bit too close, visible oil leaks from
the rover's wheel hubs in a vacuum, and Moonscapes that can now be
overlayed, using modern tools like Photoshop, to reveal the base photos
were reused across different Apollo missions' landing sites.
In the bitter end, it's not hard to conclude the missions weren't real, sadly, the opposite is true.
So,
THANK YOU, Bart Sibrel, for exposing the worst lie in human history.
It takes incredible moral strength, and thanks to you, we now understand
what our government is capable of. The only question remaining in my
mind is... was it a well intentioned lie, or a petty heist of $150
billion dollars. I wonder what the original outspoken skeptics:
Grissom, White, and Chaffee, would say?
Bart Sibrel takes you on a harrowing tale of missing brake fluid,
loudly humming phones, faceless foes as well as friends. Betrayals
bewilderments and a Bonzi breakout complete with barbed wire topped
fences, muddy creeks and kindnesses of strange as well as strangers.
I found this book quite the page turner. I drank in the 12 chapters in
3 1/2 hours. My favorite part is the supportive emails Bart included .
I really liked the one on pg 164. Sibrel flexes his formidable
ability of logic and casts damning, extremely serious doubt upon the
alleged moon landings. He then offers proof which SLAMS the door on all
doubt. Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins footage they shot in the
capsule, "halfway" to the moon, changed the life forever, of the man who
discovered it. Sibrels book reinforces the fact that no amount of
belief can make something true. I commend and applaud Bart Sibrels
courage to bring the Apollo deception to light in exposing the guilty.
HE NAMES NAMES!! PLACES!! DATES AND TIMES!! Abby Hoffman had us to steal
his book, Bart would have you purchase his at a very reasonable price.
Yet the information contained in it has cost many many lives. Sibrels
Moon Man is a page turner, edge of your seat experience, shrieking truth
and logic in every paragraph. This book earned my highest recommendation.
Bart Winfield Sibrel is a Nashville, Tennessee-based filmmaker who advances ... that the sixApollo Moon landings between 1969 and 1972 were hoaxes. He has filmed two documentaries on the subject:
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and Astronauts Gone Wild
Dealings with Apollo astronauts
Most astronauts have refused to grant him interviews. The most infamous incident involved Apollo 11 crew member Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon. According to Aldrin, he was lured to a Beverly Hills hotel under the pretext of an interview on space for a Japanese children's television show. When he arrived, Aldrin claims Sibrel was there demanding that he swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon. When Aldrin refused, Sibrel called him a "coward", a "liar", and a "thief".
[1]
An exasperated Aldrin punched Sibrelin in the jaw, which was recorded. Sibrel later attempted to use the tape to convince police and prosecutors that he was the victim of an assault. However, it was decided that Aldrin had been provoked, and, based on Sibrel's unfazed, nearly instant reaction to his cameraman, did not actually injure Sibrel, so no charges were filed. Many talk showsaired the clip, making Sibrel the butt of jokes.
[2]
Sibrel said later (?) that he wrote a letter of apology to Aldrin.
[3]
Claims
In the 2001 documentary,
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, Sibrel made several claims that hebelieved show that the Apollo Moon Landings were faked.Sibrel displayed footage which he claimed was accidentally sent to him from NASA, which, according to Sibrel, wasevidence that the Apollo 11 astronauts were staging shots of the Earth to make it appear that the spacecraft was
enroute
to the moon when Sibrel believes it was still in low Earth orbit.
[4]
[5]
Those defending Project Apollo state the"secret" NASA footage Sibrel uses is actually widely available and merely shows the astronauts practicing for an upcoming live telecast.
[6]
Sibrel believes that the technology of the United States during the era was behind that of the Soviet Union. He points to a supposed "five-to-one superiority" in man-hours in space held by the Soviets over the US as well as highlightingseveral Soviet space firsts.
[7]
The veracity of the "five-to-one" figure has been challenged (?) by the Clavius website, which is dedicated to the debunking of the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations stating that the Americans had a clear lead in man-hours in space by the time Apollo 11 was launched.
[8]
He has also stated the life-threatening events that occurred during the Apollo 13 mission were actually manufacturedby the government to force people to pay attention to the space program.Bart Sibrel also participated in the controversial Fox Television Network special,
Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?
In it, Sibrel stated that, "I'd bet my life that we never went to the Moon."
Criticism
(LIAR) Jim McDade, writing in the Birmingham News, characterizedA Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to (LIAR) McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the 47-minute film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says (LIAR) McDade.
The Rashida (Rosetta) Stone (part only) taken in 1899 from the town
of Rashid (Egypt) by the invading French armies, later taken by the
British invaders. In the “Demotic” section Arabic script is clearly
visible. Abu Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah (founder of the science of
Algebra) was the first scholar to decode hieroglyphs, one thousand
years before Jean Champollion according to Dr Okasha El Daly
Egyptian pyramid at Giza and the Sphinx
Aztec pyramid
Chapter One
THE ARROGANCE OF A PROMINENT SCIENTIST
BBC interviewer: "Is Evolution a Theory?" Pr Dawkins: "No, it is a fact!"
Oxford University Professor Richard Dawkins – UK
THIS IS YET ANOTHER VIEW OF THE RARELY TOLD “HISTORY” OF HUMANKIND. [To be reviewed!]
Addressing University students, Oxford Zoologist Professor
Richard Dawkins [1941-….], an Atheist, Evolutionist and Humanist
lecturer, stated once to a huge gathering of students (seemingly ready
and willing to be indoctrinated) that the cleverest ape-man that has
ever lived was Aristotle, a soldier in Alexander of Macedonia’s army, a
man who never went to a real school (the first modern schools and
universities came with the Muslims) and who spent twenty years learning
“philosophy” while “walking with Plato”, and Pr Dawkins was seen on
British television (where freedom of speech is absent) boasting that
the “White European race” sprung from the Aristotelian racial lineage.
If Irish George Bernard Shaw was alive today, he would have gladly
given that arrogant Professor a piece of his uniquely great human mind,
but any striving and tolerant Muslim (by definition, a Muslim is
moderate and tolerant), have the duty to pray to God Almighty to guide
the deluded Professor and show him the Light, although there is little
hope that this may ever happen. His ape-man religion has been proven
many times to be the fabrication of scientists lacking in honesty. The
fact is that no indisputable trace of humankind or of its civilisation
seems to have yet been discovered beyond ten (twenty) thousand years.
Could we, humans, old pyramid (ziggurat) builders, have come from
another far away planet or from another dimension or are we simply the
recent product of an interbreeding with some extraterrestrial beings
(the extraterrestrial gods)? Or are we simply the product of an almost
impossible to fathom Creator?
A selected few, people of great knowledge, faith and wisdom,
like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Mark Hanson, a Greek Orthodox Christian reverted to
Islam, and one of the brightest scholars in Islamic and human matters,
a man who has attained the highest level of faith and spirituality,
seems to have definite answers about God, Mankind, the world and its
origins. Such great souls are convinced the world was created by design
and that we were created human, while others like the Nairobi-born
Zoologist Richard Dawkins maintain that all we see around us is just an
accident of multiple evolutionary processes with no design and no
purpose at all, and that we are only animals (rock and bacteria) that
have evolved into humans in a world “of savage competition, ruthless
exploitation, and deceit”. Of course this is not science but only the
Professor’s atheist religion!
WHERE THERE IS GOD (invented or real, or what He represents),
don’t we see more LOVE, hope, goodness, decency, cleanliness, charity,
morality, patience in adversity, compassion, forgiveness, freedom,
justice, mercy, and humankind as a also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?
And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see more
HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness,
immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery,
racism, injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL
KINDS, and Man as only material and only an (evolved) animal, an
INHUMAN and monstrous being sprung from “thousands or millions of
accidental genetic mutations”?
What did Karl Mordecai Marx himself, “the last of the great Jewish
prophets” turned atheist, really mean when he wrote “religion is the
opium of the people”. We witness rich and poor, black and white,
scientists and poets, Atheists and Believers, good and bad people being
addicted to religion, all kinds of religion, and not only the “vile
populace” of indoctrinated beings (human sheep). Only by going beyond
faith, that we can manage to understand much of what is happening in a
world that belongs to the powerful, the mercilessly cruel, and the
rich, and not to humankind anymore, not even to GOD. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf
Hanson argues that if one believes in God, he or she is strengthened in
that belief and God is then with him or her, but if someone does not
believe in God, he or she is strengthened in his or her unbelief and
abandoned by God. Professor Richard Dawkins drowns himself in an ocean
of unbelief and pseudo-scientific beliefs when it concerns God. His
opium is the religion of atheism and animalism (‘humanism’). Isn’t it a
paradox that Atheists should call themselves Humanists when they
believe and claim they are only (evolved) animals?
While the Greco-Roman Holy Christian Bible recognises Satan
as the ruler of the world, Dawkins gives us a clue as to who now rule
and should rule our world thanks to their “rebellious selfish genes” as
tale-told by himself in his famous pseudo-scientific
“thriller-manual-manifesto” (The Selfish Gene, 1976) in which he
zealously defends the hoax (deceit) of macro evolution, and propounds
his “fundamental law of gene selfishness”. Pr Dawkins is paid by our
tax-money (with the full blessings of Queen Elisabeth II) to preach his
fabricated religion of selfishness to our youth. According to him there
is no Merciful, Compassionate, Generous and Just God, no Creator, but,
instead, eternal selfish genes competing directly with their alleles
for survival created man, and they are “naturally selecting” the best
genes for survival, meaning the White European genes inherited from
Aristotle, and he, Richard Dawkins, the disciple of the Selfish
Gene-God, is one of the worshippers and defenders of Animalism and of
western secular ‘democratic’ regimes.
Pr Dawkins would be one of those who survived this savage competition,
which gives his “naturally selected” race the right to wipe out the 5-6
billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own survival. Although
billions of people in such a materialist world find it more and more
very hard today, due to western cultural and political oppression and
terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen) God-Creator, why
does the Professor show such arrogance and scoff at others who are
believers in God, whether He exists or not? His delusion (sickness of
the mind) prevents him from seeing and admitting his own fanatical
belief in the Selfish Gene-God, his opium! Even Atheists have their
prophets like Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward Bernays (who inspired
Adolph Hitler, George W. Bush and other western fascist and Zionist
regimes), Charles Darwin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their likes.
We are living in a society and a world where morality has been replaced
by force by all kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New
Age religion with its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family
and the prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our
babies to be sold into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected
corporations to Israel and other western and western-client countries),
the worshipping of money and fame, the poisoning of mind and body by
drugs (including nicotine, alcohol and mainly Jewish owned
pharmaceutical so-called medicine), Zionist television, pornography,
and the complete control and dehumanisation of mankind. Those who
resist the western military regimes and their allies are ruthlessly
murdered along with their entire families by the Zionist New Secular
(Talmudist) World Order, their countries relentlessly bombed and
devastated, and their peoples slaughtered mercilessly, jailed,
tortured, mentally and physically shattered, maimed for life and
starved to death by the tens of millions.
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink
Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can be committed to science, but as soon as you're committed to a hypothesis, you've walked off the trail of objective truth, says Richard Dawkins. For him, that is the mission of science and the purpose of the scientific method: these truths exist—they are the foundations of innovations like vaccinations, antibiotics, and space travel, because they are built on something solid: evidence. Einstein is known for highly valuing the role of imagination in science, and Dawkins agrees: imagination and intuition are the springboards scientific progress depends on—but when evidence refutes a hypothesis or a feeling, that's the end of the line. Dogged persistence doesn't get you any closer to the truth, says Dawkins, only critical thinking can do that. Richard Dawkins' latest book is Science In The Soul: Selected Writings of a Passionate Rationalist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RICHARD DAWKINS
Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and the former Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He is the author of several of modern science's essential texts, including The Selfish Gene (1976) and The God Delusion (2006). Born in Nairobi, Kenya, Dawkins eventually graduated with a degree in zoology from Balliol College, Oxford, and then earned a masters degree and the doctorate from Oxford University. He has recently left his teaching duties to write and manage his foundation, The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, full-time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSCRIPT:
Richard Dawkins: The first chapter of 'Science in the Soul' is called 'The Values of Science and the Science of Values'. And it does, of course, give prominence to objective truth. There is a kind of whispering campaign—more than a whispering campaign, sometimes a yelling campaign—against the value of objective truth. Science, I think, is committed to objective truth; we’re committed to the view that truth is independent of the cultural background of the scientist, for example. So as I said in the book, an experiment done in a lab in New York can be replicated in a lab in New Delhi, and if it’s all done correctly in the same way they’ll get the same result. Science’s belief in objective truth works. Engineering technology based upon the science of objective through achieves results: it manages to build planes that get off the ground, it manages to send people to the moon and explore Mars with robots, and land robotic vehicles on comets. Science works. Science produces antibiotics, it produces vaccines that work. So anybody who chooses to say, “Oh, there’s no such thing as objective truth, it’s all subjective, it’s all socially constructed,” tell that to a doctor, tell that to a space scientist.
Manifestly, science works and the view that “there is no such thing as objective truth” doesn’t. Science proceeds, I believe, in the sort of Popperian view that science proceeds by intuitive leaps of the imagination, building an idea of what might be true and then testing it by experiment, by observation, in the second phase. It’s a kind of Darwinian selection of mutation, which is provided by the imagination.
So intuition is very important, but it is important that scientists should not be so wedded to their intuition that they omit the very important testing phase, and if their hypothesis is disproved they should regard that as a reason to reject the hypothesis or modify it, not a reason to just carry on doggedly sticking to the hypothesis because they are intuitively committed to it.
The phrase 'critical thinking' is quite a cliché but it is immensely important. And so I think that I really could sum it up by saying what we need is critical thinking; we need to respect evidence, we need to respect the fact that the only reason to believe anything about the real world is evidence. The evidence must be assessed critically, preferably statistically and logically. You cannot derive truths about the real world by intuition alone, by feelings alone, by what feels good.
People who say things like, “All opinions are equally valid,” or, “Well, it’s true for me, it may not be true for you.” Never tolerate that kind of thing. The only reason to believe anything is true is that there’s evidence, and everybody should either look at the evidence for themselves or they should trust that the person they’re talking to has looked at the evidence in a scientific, logical, rational,...
For the full transcript, check out https://bigthink.com/videos/richard-d...
For the full video go to: http://www.newrealities.com/index.php...
Maxwell goes into a detailed explanation about why the United States of
America is a corporate entity and why states are countries and the
difference between State and Federal ownership even when states are
involved.
ISLAM IS NOT A CORPORATION!
Jordan Maxwell -Maritime Law Rules the World Commerce and Courts
Thanks to Evita Ochel
of EBTV for the wonderful interview covering topics ranging from
spirituality and science, to health and veganism, to conspiracies and
the flat Earth.
Dedicated to my children and grandchildren To my very dear and faithful friend Adalberto Erazo Jr. And to all seekers of knowledge
From
Daryl's Encyclopedia (updated 4 May 2013) (Re-posted in 2014)
RE:
OUTRIGHT LIES IN GCSE DOUBLE SCIENCE BIOLOGY
Yahoo/Inbox
CustomerAdmin <customerservices@cgpbooks.co.uk>
To:bafremauxsoormally
26 Aug
2005 at 16:53
Dear
Basheer
Thank you
for your email about our GCSE Double Science Biology Revision Guide.
We're sorry that you are unhappy with the content of our coverage
of the topic of "Evolution", however this book, like all our titles,
is written to reflect the requirements of the exam specifications
laid down by the exam boards who set the GCSE Double Science
courses for GCSE - AQA, Edexcel and OCR..
Their
remit is to reflect current scientific thinking in the GCSE course,
which includes theoretical science such as the theory of
Evolution.
We aim to present the best possible revision material to
match the
set course syllabuses in order to help as many students as
possible
to pass their exams. We do not set the course content, we
simply
cover it as best we can.
We would
therefore suggest that you refer any queries or comments about the
actual content of the syllabus to AQA, Edexcel and OCR, since it is they, not
us, who decide what goes into it. You can visit their websites
at www.aqa.org.uk, www.edexcel.org.uk and www.ocr.org.uk.
Thank you
for taking the time to write to us. We welcome all feedback and we
are glad to allow you a forum to express your views - though we recommend
you now take the matter up with the relevant exam boards.
One simple and definitive proof that you are not living on a spinning ball orbiting around the Sun is the fact that daytime and nighttime never switch places as they must for the heliocentric model to be true. According to the globe doctrine, Earth makes one complete rotation on its axis every 24 hours, while simultaneously orbiting around the Sun and completing one full revolution every 365 days. If this was truly happening however, as you can see from the following image, the daytime and nighttime sides of the globe would have to flip every 6 months.
For a more detailed illustration of this, imagine the Sun rising at 6am in New York on the Summer solstice. After 3 months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 90 degrees from its previous position and a quarter turn away from the Sun, meaning that sunrise in New York during the Autumnal equinox should now be happening at midnight. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be on the complete opposite side of the Sun, 180 degrees from its starting position, so that sunrise in New York during the Winter solstice should be happening at 6pm, or in other words, daytime and nighttime would have completely flipped from 6 months earlier. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 270 degrees from its original position, and sunrise in New York during the Spring equinox should be happening at noon.
In reality, as you can test and observe for yourself, this simply does not happen and remains yet another nail in the globe's coffin. Globe apologist naysayers make either one of two ridiculous claims in an attempt to excuse away this clear problem in their model. Their first defense is to claim that days are not actually 24 hours long, but instead only 23:56 long, and this 4 minute difference per day fixes the math allowing day and night to flip. Now it is true that there are two kinds of days known as solar days and sidereal days, and sidereal days are in fact 23:56 minutes long, but solar days, which everyone on Earth sets their clocks by, are exactly 24 hours in duration. Sidereal days, which nobody sets their clocks by, are actually how long the fixed stars take to make one revolution over and around our Earth plane. As you can observe and measure for yourself, the constellations rotate just slightly faster than the Sun, so that they take exactly 23:56 minutes to come back to their starting point, while the Sun takes exactly 24 hours to come back to its starting point.
Firstly, the fact that sidereal and solar days both exist and are not exactly the same duration, is yet another proof that the stars and Sun are moving and not the Earth. If the apparent movement of the stars and Sun was actually the result of us living on a spinning globe, as we're told, then there would and could only be one duration of day, namely, the amount of time it takes to complete one full rotation. The fact that there are two different durations of rotation time for the Sun and stars just further proves that they are moving at their own unique speeds over and around a motionless, fixed Earth. Secondly, if globe apologists want to claim solar days are now suddenly only 23:56 minutes, then why hasn't anyone in history ever noticed that our 24 hour clocks, which billions of people have used for thousands of years, actually fall behind reality 4 minutes every single day!? The reason is because it doesn't happen, and trying to claim solar days are the same duration as sidereal days just shows the disingenuous lengths these zealots will go to cling onto their false cosmology.
Their next defense, even more ridiculous than the first, is to claim that the Earth actually must complete 361 degrees of rotation per day, and that that somehow makes up for it. They completely redefine what a "day" means and claim, instead of a day being one full 24 hour rotation of the globe as we have always been taught, a "day" now suddenly means "the amount of rotation until the Sun reaches the same point in the sky," which they say is approximately 361 degrees. With this excuse, however, new problems arise because the globe's supposed orbit around the Sun is actually elliptical, so depending where/when during its revolution around the Sun, the Earth's rotation on its axis would have to be both speeding up and slowing down at different times of the year just to maintain their new definition of what a "day" means. But of course in their own model, the Earth's alleged rotation never speeds up or slows down and remains constant always. They cannot have it both ways, but like the kid who wants to have his cake and eat it too, these leaps of logic pose no problem for the willfully ignorant.
For the fearlessly inquisitive critical thinkers out there, if you still believe you live on a big blue marble spinning faster than the speed of sound, please find some time to watch our new feature documentary, LEVEL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wffli...
By far one of the greatest Flat Earth
videos ever produced by Eric Dubay. I'm so glad I downloaded it months
ago so that now I can re upload it so you can download it. Everyone
share this and don't forget to help out Eric and subscribe to his
channel.
Eric Dubay:
Confirmation donc, la théorie de l’évolution viens du Sataniste
Erasmus Darwin Maçon du 33 ème dégré, repris par son fils Charles. cet
théorie est issue des juifs naturaliste et d'autres sectes comme
Rose-Croix, qui on tous un lien avec la Franc-maçonnerie moderne , La
théorie de l'évolution n'est pas une découverte originale de Darwin. Il
n'a rien fait de plus que de rappliquer une ancienne philosophie, La
théorie de l'évolution matérialiste a été développée par les philosophes
païens de la Grèce antique.
Les premiers à promouvoir la théorie de l'évolution dans l'Europe
moderne étaient membres de la société maçonnique connue sous le nom de
rosicruciens.
Ses membres étaient supposés posséder des connaissances secrètes. Mais
le plus important héritage de l'ordre de la Rose-Croix est la
philosophie naturaliste et l'idée d'évolution, dont elle fait partie.
Les maçons déclarent que les racines de la maçonnerie remontent aux
templiers et aux rosicruciens, en soulignant la philosophie
évolutionniste de ces derniers.
Cet penser matérialiste a crée de véritable monstre, et des guerre
sanglante, référence a la révolution en France.
C'est pour cette raison qu'ils faisaient du naturalisme la base de leurs
principes et se sont fait connaître comme les "naturalistes" voilà d'ou
viens cet idée d'évolution.
Et cela peut venir que d'ibliss leur maître,
car dans la franc-maçonnerie pour ceux qui savent pas
25 eme degrée : perversion de l'égalité
26 degré : perversion de la fraternité
27 degré : perversion de l' intellectualité
28 degré : Glorification du NATURALISME !
29 degrée : Négation du créateur
30 dergré : glorification de l'hypocrisie
31 degrée : parodie avilissante de la justice
32 degrée : Parodie avilissante de la légalité
33eme degrée : glorification de lucifer [satan]
On voit que tous est lié, et que cet théorie n'a pas été propager par
hasard, et que beaucoup prétend être "scientifique" mais son en réalité
de véritable suppôt du diable.
SATANIC SEXUAL EDUCATION IN FRENCH SCHOOLS
Quoted by MIKE KING: "Tesla on Theoretical Science: “Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.The scientists from Franklin to Morse were clear thinkers and did not produce erroneous theories. The scientists of today think deeply27instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."(4)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkgMLKx7sd0
Episode 11: Forbidden History // Darwin’s Hoax of "Evolution"
"The fundamental claim of intelligent design is straightforward and easily intelligible: namely, there are natural systems that cannot be adequately explained in terms of undirected natural forces and that exhibit features which in any other circumstance we would attribute to intelligence."
― William A. Dembski, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design
Dr. Dembski has taught at Northwestern University, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Dallas. He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. Dr. Dembski is a graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy. He also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996. He has held National Science Foundation graduate and postdoctoral fellowships.
"Ewww... intelligent design people! They're just buck-toothed, Bible-pushing nincompoops with community-college degrees who're trying to sell a gussied-up creationism to a cretinous public! No need to address their concerns or respond to their arguments. They are Not Science. They are poopy-heads. There. I just saved you the trouble of reading 90 percent of the responses to the Intelligent Design position... This is how losers act just before they lose: arrogant, self-satisfied, too important to be bothered with substantive refutation, and disdainful of their own faults... The only remaining question is whether Darwinism will exit gracefully, or whether it will go down biting, screaming, censoring, and denouncing to the bitter end."
― Jonathan Wells, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Jonathan Wells has received two Ph.D.s, one in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley, and one in Religious Studies from Yale University.
Be honest. Have you personally examined the evidence about the identity of Jesus Christ and come to a thoughtful conclusion as to what this means to you? Your conclusion has eternal consequences.
Merriam Webster defines:
ex·am·ine (noun)
: the act of looking at something closely and carefully
ev·i·dence (noun)
: something which shows that something else exists or is true
con·clu·sion (noun)
: a final decision or judgment : an opinion or decision that is formed after a period of thought or research
truth (noun)
: the state of being the case, fact : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality, a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality
in·tel·lec·tu·al (adjective)
: of or relating to the ability to think in a logical way
: involving serious study and thought
Dr David Berlinski
Margaret Temple (Maryam Noor) aged 65 - How I Found the Truth - SCOTLAND
[See also 19 July 2012 Truthseeker - https://www.truth-seeker.info/guided-atheists/scottish-atheist-lady-finds-islam-age-65/]
Scottish Atheist Lady Finds Islam at the Age of 65
July 19, 2012 0
By Truth-Seeker Staff
Margaret Templeton who became Maryam Noor at the age of 65
My name is Maryam Noor, that is my Islamic name, and my original name is Margaret Templeton.
I was born in Scotland to a house which was atheist. In our house, we
were not allowed ever to speak about God, and even if we learned
something in school, we were not allowed to say anything or we would be
punished.
For as long as I can remember, I have been seeking the Truth about
why I am here in this world, what I’m here for, what am I supposed to
do.
As soon as I became old enough, I began to search for some
information about this “person called God”, that people mention, and all
through my life, I have been seeking the Truth, not a particular
religion. The Truth, something which made sense to me, something which
opened my heart and which made my life worthwhile. I have been
practically in every church in the kingdom, both here and at home, it
never occurred to me to think about Islam.
I became interested in Islam, but the war took place in Iraq, and I
read the terrible things which were being said in the papers about
Muslims, but I was well educated about other religions to know that
these things were not true, that lies were being told, and so I went
seeking for a teacher who could teach me something about the Islamic way
of life, so that I would be able to refute these things that were being
said about Muslims which were wrong, which were lies, and which came
from shaytan, or Satan as I called him then.
One of the things that I do is that I talk to everyone. I used to
smile to everyone and say “Hello”, “How are you”, and “What’s your day
like” .. as Jesus spread happiness whenever he was. At that time I was a
Roman Catholic but I was very unhappy and I left the Church, and I
didn’t know where to go.
At the same time, I was seeking for a teacher in Islam, I was praying
constantly all day to God “Help … Help … Help … Help ..” over and over
and over all day for almost two years, because I did not know what to do
or where to go.
A friend of a friend of a friend brought me the name of an alim
– a scholar. His name was Nur El-Din, and he was an Arab born in this
country. He invited me to come to his house, which I did, and he told me
what books to buy, and that I could call him if I had questions. And
that was our relationship. There were seven volumes of this book, it was
a commentary on the Qur’an, and it was excellent.
So I started to study. I opened the first book, I read the
acknowledgement. I did not start from the back, I started from the
front, and I was immediately in Al-Baqarah. And before Al-Baqarah, there
was Al-Fatihah, and I read Al-Fatihah, and it was like I was struck by
lightning, tears flowed from my eyes, tears like Niagara Falls. My heart
beat very quickly, … I was sweating, I was shaking, … I was afraid this
was shaytan, like he was trying to stop me because I might
find the way, because this book might get me the way to Truth, which is
what I was seeking.
I phoned the alim, he said come I want to see you. So I went
to him in the depth of winter, and I arrived there like a block of ice,
but a little suffering is nothing for Allah as I found. And I explained
my experience to my alim. I said this is shaytan,
what should I do? One of the things which took place during these tears
was I saw my heart, I could see my heart out here, red, very large,
rather bright, not shaped like it at all. I was rather frightened, and I
said what do you think I should do?
And he said to me “Margaret” he said, “you are going to become a Muslim”.
And I said “But I am not reading these books in order to become a Muslim”.
“I am reading them in order to be able to refute the lies that are being told about the Muslim people.”
“I don’t want to become a Muslim”.
And he said “Well Margaret, you are going to become a Muslim, because
I must tell you, there has been divine intervention in your life.” I
was 65 years old. I am now 66. I have been a Muslim for one year.
I went on studying with the alim, from about November to February, and I could not wait any longer to do my shahada,
and I asked him do you think it is too soon for me to come, because I
really don’t want to become a Muslim, but I’m sure I will learn and God
will forgive me that I had not appreciated this great gift that He gave
me. I was not hateful of appreciating it, I was too small, too much a
sinner, to appreciate this great gift that He gave me.
He said “Noor, come on the 11th. of February 2003, and he sat a bit
far from me …, he was dressed in white from head to toe, and he said
“Repeat after me” and he said the shahada which I repeated after him.
Then I said “What did I say?” and he told me in English what I said,
and I said “Then I’m a Muslim” and he said “Yes and your name is
Maryam”.
I can’t say that I’m a good Muslim as it is extremely difficult. I
lost all my catholic friends, all the friends that I talked with. My
daughter thinks that I’m crazy! My son is the only one who believes that
I may have found the truth and he is the only one at the moment who may
become a Muslim.
The second thing which makes my life very difficult is that I live in
a secular world and not in a Muslim world and I want with all my heart
to live in a Muslim world and to have a Muslim community. I’m the only
Muslim in the area where I live. But Allah has been very good to me
because amid all these difficulties, I’m happy, I’m studying.
I read everything in English because of my age, as I can’t remember
the recitation so I use a book. And I ask Allah “Please remember Allah,
the most Merciful and most Compassionate, that I’m really only a baby,
but I’m a 65 years old baby and I have little difficulties and You must
help me” and this is one of the ways He is helping me.
To watch Maryam Noor (formerly Margaret Templeton) relating her own story click the two video clips below…
But, millions other people do not go along with Pr Richard Dawkins’
animal ideology and choose to believe in a God or in many gods.
Unfortunately, by their own fault, they do not have adequate armies to
protect their beliefs and nations from attacks and destruction by the
Atheist, Secular, ‘Humanist’ and Zionist New World Order super military
powers.
Of apparently intolerant Atheist parents, Mrs Margaret Temple
of Scotland (above) found God through Islam (for others it is through
Christianity or Christ) at the age of 65 in very mysterious
circumstances, and took the Shahadah, the Islamic Testimony that there
is none worthy of worship (no other god) except God and that Muhammad
is His Messenger. When you sincerely and wholeheartedly look for God,
you will find Him, so goes the saying. This is evidence that “God” (or
a Godly inspired Arab, Muhammad) was right about the fitra (natural
inclination towards Islam) He says in the Holy Furqân (Criterion) or
Holy Qur’ân (Recitation) He had put at birth in every human being He
had Himself created, and thus disproving the selfish gene fabricated by
our learned but misguided and unscientific Professor.
On Saturday 26th June 2004 one Christian Cotten
(chriscotten@wanadoo.fr) circulated an email entitled “A Story of
Angels and of a Father : UNE HISTOIRE D'ANGES ET DE PÈRE
by “Philippe” philippeplantey@free.fr. Is it a fabrication or a true
story? One M. Lloyd Glenn (USA) rushed to the hospital to see his 3
year-old son Brian who was crushed to death by his automatic garage
door. The boy miraculously survived and doctors confirmed that his
heart and brain suffered no apparent damage. The near tragedy brought
the whole family closer together. One day at home young Brian surprised
his mother by addressing her using an unusually long sentence for his
age.
Alain Soral with Christian Cotten
“Sit down mother, I have something to tell you. Do you remember when
I was stuck by the garage door? You know, it was so heavy and really
painful. I called you, but you could not hear me. I started crying but
it was too painful. Suddenly the small birds came. They chirped and
flew around in the garage and took care of me. One of them came and
made you come. It came to tell you I was stuck by the door. They were
so beautiful. They were all white. Some were white and green. They told
me the baby will be okay, the baby lying on the garage floor. You went
out, opened the garage door and ran to the baby. You told him to stay
and not to go away.”
Kneeling by the side of the crushed baby, Lloyd’s wife had
indeed said: "Don’t leave us Brian, stay with us if this is possible!”
Brian continued: “We have travelled very far away from
here. We have flown so quickly in the air. They are so beautiful,
Mummy! There are many, many birds.”
A three year-old boy was nearly crushed to death under an office
partition glass panel weighing over 100kg, but was ‘miraculously’ saved
from a certain death by a wall radiator. (Paris 1986)
Brian said the birds told him he had to come back to life to tell about
them to everybody, and they brought him back home. There was a big fire
engine truck, an ambulance. A man carried the baby on a white bed and
he was told the baby would be okay.
Brian said the birds were always with us but we do not see
them because we look with our eyes, and we do not hear them because we
listen with our ears. They are all there and we can see them here
(putting his hand on his heart).
Brian continued: “I have a destiny, mother. You have a
destiny. Father has a destiny. Everybody has a destiny. We must all
live our destiny and fulfil our promises. The birds help us to live our
destiny and fulfil our promises because they love us very much.”
What is true, what is false? It is true however that God seems
really a figment of our imagination, but does denying the existence of
God solve the problem of millions of human beings who will never quench
their thirst for the divine and the sacred? It is an established fact
that millions of people, without having to be indoctrinated in any
religion, thirst for God or for some kind of Providence – just like an
addict for his opium. But, those who have lived miracles know the
truth; a truth that intelligent people like Pr Richard Dawkins are
unable to comprehend – the possibility of another reality. The “Heart”,
not the mind, perceives certain truths. Pr Dawkins’ very existence is a
miracle, but he refuses to be grateful to the One Who (might have)
created him. Does God or angels exist or not? Many have known God, and
seen angels, been with them, talked to them, been assisted by them, and
saved by their belief in God, whether He exists or not, simply by their
strong Faith in any deity whatsoever or even in any absolutely
fabricating being. Hindus have been very well known to turn humans into
gods. Christians have turned at least one human into God and another
human into the mother of God. Hindus have millions of them, and do
still believe in them and practice rituals even to this day every
single day of their lives! Many lead quite a happy and peaceful life by
being a Hindu.
Even the ones who claim to have had near-death experience
and swear they have seen GOD, a male, white, blond hair and blue eye
Jesus Christ or the “Mother of God”, a white, blond and blue-eyed
female, “the Virgin Mary”, when they died have definitely seen and
lived something wonderful and beyond description when they were
certified dead clinically. But, what they saw was the fruit of their
own imagination and beliefs. As a historian it may be completely out of
question to believe in or rely upon such an unhistorical figure as
Jesus Christ, but as a scientist why not? Jesus Christ was an Arab
(Middle Eastern Palestinian) and cannot be as “Caucasian” as the White
(rather Pink!) European Christians or the Black Africans have been made
to believe for now two millennia. But, many people are sincere and have
indeed experienced life after death, and seen and heard incredible
things before they returned to their bodies. Although some stories are
incredible to believe, like in Betty J. Eadie’s book “EMBRACED BY THE
LIGHT” (Thorsons, UK, 1995) in which a woman saw the white Jesus Christ
as the God-Creator, as One and at the same time as two separate Beings.
One common thing to all these miraculous beings coming back from the
other side of life is the message of love they bring us, but neither
Dawkins’ nor his “selfish genes” can explain this human reality.
Whether he is a myth or a real being, many lives have been saved from
immorality and a life of crime and sin by the Jewish Jesus Christ, and
by the love Jewish or Pauline Christians attribute to him.
Is there not more to man than Pr Dawkins’ “selfish genes” that are
devoid of compassion, hope and a real sense of justice? There is
definitely more to life and truth than what we perceive, see, hear,
think and are made to believe. But, whatever the truth, it is beyond
doubt that we, humans and animal-humans, the kinds that are ruling our
world (reptilians would say David Icke) are all victims (or
accomplices) of a an Elite that has taken over through bloodshed and
extreme savagery the entire world with their headquarters in the United
States of America, Britain, Europe, Eretz Israël and their satellites –
the real Axis of Evil. Former US Attorney Ramsey Clark admitted that
his country was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world”. US Pr
Chomsky, Pr Howard Zinn and many other academics confirm this point of
view.
Dr. KENT HOVIND challenged the world of scientists believing in
and teaching the “religion of macro-evolution”. A few took up the
challenge and failed, and the others ignored it.
“I have a standing offer of $250,000 to anyone who can give
any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.* My $250,000
offer demonstrates that the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more
than a religious belief.[36]
[36] ^ a b Hovind, Kent. "Hovind's $250,000 Offer", Dr. Dino.com, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-10-18. “
When Pr Richard Dawkins was asked by a BBC correspondent to provide any
proof for macro-evolution, he was unable to do so. When asked whether
macro-evolution was just a theory or a fact, he answered it was fact.
Coming from a man of science of such a reputation, Pr Dawkins should be
ashamed to utter such a big lie. Whether Dr Hovind is right or wrong
about his religious beliefs is not relevant here. The truth is that no
evolutionists, including Pr Dawkins, have ever provided any scientific
evidence to conclusively prove their claim of a theory that on the
contrary has been proved to be a hoax by many. Harun Yahya (Adnan
Oktar) in The Evolution Deceit, the Origin of life lecture by Dr A.E.
Wilder Smith, the work of “Jehovah Witnesses” on the subject, etc.
“Kent Hovind had been charged with falsely declaring bankruptcy,
making threats against federal officials, filing false complaints,
failing to get necessary building permits, and various tax-related
charges. He was convicted of federal tax and related charges, for which
he is currently serving a 10-year sentence.”
Dr Kent Hovind was jailed on 2 November 2006. Although very
informative, the wikipedia article is very prejudiced against Dr Hovind
both on the science side and the legal aspect. Arun Russo, filmmaker
showed in his documentary Democracy to Fascism that there is no law
that can force US citizens to pay income taxes on their wages. Jo
Banister who used to work for the IRS (US Inland Revenue Service),
denounced the IRS as a fraudulent organisation. When victims of the IRS asked in Court to be shown the law, the Judge says: I do not want the Law in my Court; I am the Law!
SEVEN REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD
The following article of Mr A.Cressy Morrison, former President of the
New York Academy of Sciences first appeared in the Reader's Digest of
January, 1948; then, on the recommendation of Professor C.A.Coulson.
F.R.S., Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (the same
university where Pr Richard Dawkins teaches), was republished in the
Reader's Digest of November, 1960. – It shows how science compels the
scientists to admit the essential need of a Supreme Creator. But Pr
Richard Dawkins chose not to admit this scientific reality.
“We are still in the dawn of the scientific age and every increase
of light reveals more brightly the handiwork of an intelligent Creator.
In the ninety years since Darwin we have made stupendous discoveries;
with a spirit of scientific humility and of faith grounded in knowledge
we are approaching even nearer to an awareness of God.
For myself, I count seven reasons for my faith:-
First:
By unwavering mathematical law we can prove that our universe was designed and executed by a great engineering Intelligence.
Suppose you put ten coins, marked from one to ten, into your
pocket and give them a good shuffle. Now try to take them out in
sequence from one to ten, putting back the coin each time and shaking
them all again. Mathematically, we know that your chance of first
drawing number one is one in ten; of drawing one and two in succession,
one in hundred; of drawing one, two and three in succession, one in a
thousand, and so on; your chance of drawing them all, from one to
number ten in succession, would reach the unbelievable figure of one
chance in ten thousand million.
By the same reasoning, so many exacting conditions are
necessary for life on earth that they could not possibly exist in
proper relationship by chance. The earth rotates on its axis at one
thousand miles an hour; if it turned at one hundred miles an hour, our
days and nights would be ten times as long as now, and the hot sun
would then burn up our vegetation during each long day while in the
long night any surviving sprout would freeze.
Again, the sun, source of our life, has a surface
temperature of 12,000 degrees Fahrenheit, and our earth is just far
enough away so that this “eternal fire” warms us just enough and not
too much! If the sun gave off only one-half of its present radiation,
we would freeze, and if it gave half as much more, we would roast.
The slant of the earth, tilted at an angle of 23 degrees,
gives us our seasons; if it had not been so tilted, vapours from the
ocean would move north and south, piling up for us continents of ice.
If our moon were, say, only fifty thousand miles away instead of its
actual distance, our tides would be so enormous that twice a day all
continents would be submerged; even the mountains would soon be eroded
away. If the crust of the earth had been only ten feet thicker, there
would be no oxygen without which animal life must die. Had the ocean
been a few feet deeper, carbon dioxide and oxygen would have been
absorbed and no vegetable life could exist. Or, if our atmosphere had
been thinner, some of the meteors, now burned in space by the million
every day, would be striking all parts of the earth, starting fire
everywhere.
Because of these, and host of other examples, there is not one chance in millions that life on our planet is an accident.
Second:
The resourcefulness of life to accomplish its purpose is a manifestation of all-pervading intelligence.
What life itself is, no man has fathomed. It has neither weight
nor dimensions, but it does have force; a growing root will crack a
rock. Life has conquered water, land and air, mastering the elements,
compelling them to dissolve and reform their combinations.
Life, the sculptor, shapes all living things; an artist, it
designs every leaf of every tree, and colours every flower. Life is a
musician and has each bird sing its love songs, the insects to call
each other in the music of their multitudinous sounds. Life is a
sublime chemist, giving taste to fruits and spices, and perfume to the
rose, changing water and carbonic acid into sugar and wood and, in so
doing, releasing oxygen so that animals may have the breath of life.
Behold an almost invisible drop of protoplasm, transparent
and jelly-like, capable of motion, drawing energy from the sun. This
single cell, this transparent mist-like droplet, holds within itself
the germ of life, and has the power to distribute this life to every
living thing, great and small. The powers of this droplet are greater
than our vegetation and animals and people, for all life came from it.
Nature did not create life; fire-blistered rocks and a salt-less sea
could not meet the necessary requirements.
“Who, then, has put it there?”
Third:
Animal wisdom speaks irresistibly of a good Creator who infused instinct into otherwise helpless little creatures.
The young salmon spends years at sea, then comes back to his own
river, and travels up the very side of the river into which flows the
tributary where he was born. What brings him back so precisely? If you
transfer him to another tributary, he will know at once that he is off
his course and he will fight his way down and back to the main stream
and then turn up against the current to finish his destiny more
accurately.
Even more difficult to solve is the mystery of eels. These
amazing creatures migrate at maturity from all ponds and rivers
everywhere those from Europe across thousands of miles of ocean all
bound for the same abysmal deeps near Bermuda. There they breed and
die. The little one, with no apparent means of knowing anything except
that they are in a wilderness of water, nevertheless find their way
back not only to the very shore from which their parents came but
thence to the rivers, lakes or little ponds so that each body of water
is always populated with eels. No American eel has ever been caught in
Europe, no European eel in American waters. Nature has even delayed the
maturity of the European eel by a year or more to make up for its
longer journey. Where does the directing impulse originate?
A wasp overpowers a grasshopper, digs a hole in the earth,
stings the grasshopper in exactly the right place so that he does not
die but becomes unconscious and lives on as a form of preserved meat.
Then the wasp will lay her eggs handily so that her children when they
hatch can nibble without killing the insect on which they feed; to them
dead meat would be fatal. The mother then flies away and dies; she
never sees her young. Surely the wasp must have done all this right the
first time and every time, or else there would be no wasp. Such
mysterious techniques cannot be explained by adaptation; they were
bestowed.
Fourth:
Man has something more than animal instinct the power of reason.
No other animal has ever left a record of its ability to
count ten or even to understand the meaning of ten. Where instinct is
like a single note of a flute, beautiful but limited, the human brain
contains all the notes of all the instruments in the orchestra. No need
to belabour this fourth point; thanks to the human reason we can
contemplate the possibility that we are what we are only because we
have received a spark of universal intelligence.
Fifth:
Provision for all living is revealed in phenomena which we
know today which Darwin did not know such as the wonders of genes. So
unspeakably tiny are these genes that, if all of them responsible for
all living people in the world could be put in one place, there would
be less than a thimbleful. Yet these ultra-microscopic genes and their
companions, the chromosomes, inhabit every living cell and are the
absolute keys to all human, animal and vegetable characteristics. A
thimble is a small place in which to put all the individual
characteristics of two thousand million human beings. However, the
facts are beyond question. Well, then, how do genes lock up all the
normal heredity of a multitude of ancestors and preserve the psychology
of each in such an infinitely small place? Here evolution really begins
at the cell, the entity that holds and carries genes. How a few million
atoms, locked up as an ultra microscopic gene, can absolutely rule all
on earth is an example of profound cunning and provision that could
emanate only from a Creative Intelligence no other hypothesis will
serve.
Sixth:
By the economy of nature, we are forced to realise that only
infinite wisdom could have foreseen and prepared with such astute
husbandry.
Many years ago a species of cactus was planted in Australia as a
protective fence. Having no insect enemies in Australia the cactus soon
begun a prodigious growth; the alarming abundance persisted until the
plants covered an area as long and wide as England, crowding
inhabitants out of the towns and villages, and destroying their farms.
Seeking a defence, the entomologists scoured the world; finally they
turned up an insect, which exclusively feeds on cactus, and would eat
nothing else. It would breed freely too; and it had no enemies in
Australia. So, animal soon conquered vegetable and today the cactus
pest has retreated, and with it all but a small protective residue of
the insects enough to hold the cactus in check forever.
Such checks and balances have been universally provided.
Why have not fast-breeding insects dominated the earth? Because they
have no lungs such as man possesses; they breathe through tubes. But,
when insects grow large, their tubes do not grow in ratio to the
increasing size of the body. Hence, there has never been an insect of
great size; this limitation on growth has held them all in check.
If this physical check had not been provided, man could not exist. Imagine meeting a hornet as big as a lion!
Seventh:
The fact that man conceives the idea of God is in itself a unique proof.
The conception of god rises from a divine faculty of man,
unshared with the rest of our world the faculty we call imagination. By
its power, man and man alone can find the evidence of things unseen.
The vista that power opens up is unbounded; indeed, as man is
perfected, imagination becomes a spiritual reality. He may discern in
all the evidence of design and purpose, the great truth that heaven is
everywhere and in everything, but nowhere so close as in our hearts.
It is scientifically as well as imaginatively true; in the
words of the psalmist: “ The heavens declare the glory of God and the
firmament sheweth His handiwork.”
A. Cressy Morrison
Former President of the New York Academy of Sciences
From “GOD OF ISLAM” by Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi, revised
edition published by World Organization for Islamic Services,
1978/1398, Tehran, IRAN. A previous edition was distributed free
1971-1974 by the author who was then the head of the UNIVERSAL SOCIETY OF ISLAM at both People’s & Trinity Colleges, Mauritius,.
But, whether there is a God or not, whether we are mere evolved
animals or humans don’t we have to get out of the mess our predecessors
have put us into? But, the big question is how?
Is it possible to get out the clutches of the military state system
called democracy? Democracy is evil mediacracy according to many US
personalities, and always ends up in dictatorship, according to Baptist
Christian Evangelist Dr Kent Hovind, as it has done now in the USA,
Canada, Australia, and in Europe – all white supremacist regimes,
according to Alex Jones, Aaron Russo (Democracy to Fascism), David Icke
(Democracy or Fascism), Pr Noam Chomsky (US Fascism), and many others.
Is it possible to get out of the mind controlled and
centralised system of government that has replaced all the gods?
Fascism is racism. Military Zionism is Nazism, racism and Fascism, all
in one. Karl Marx predicted Jews would one day take over the whole
world and be the supreme masters.
Is it possible to get back our liberties taken away by the state terrorist religion? Atheist hegemony is evil.
Is it possible to get rid of the fascist military that has
taken control of our civil life and liberties, that is scavenging our
roads, micro-chipping our citizens, curtailing our freedom to
circulate, running our governments, police, media, civil services and
educational and health institutions, with the complicity of (paid by)
the United Nations and big business corporations and the servile
taxpayers themselves? We are not eternal sheep that the Élite can take
to the slaughterhouse without some of us standing up and putting up a
fierce fight or are we?
Is it possible to fight the religion of immorality and
savage capitalism (pornography, prostitution, drugs, homosexuality,
paedophilia, genetic engineering, wars of conquest, genocide, global
slavery, political kidnapping and assassination, global immorality and
planet pollution) imposed upon the masses by our controlled political,
social and cultural institutions?
Finally, do we have the right to answer yes to these questions?
We have reached a stage in the evolution of mankind where
even thinking has become a crime, where freedom of expression is
curtailed more and more, and even hating the criminal deeds of a
particular group is a crime.
(The first 800 page manuscript of this book was deliberately
destroyed by an ex British soldier turned computer engineer and
salesman while he had the author’s computer in for repairs, but the
Chemsford Trading Standards concluded that he was too honourably known
in Chelmsford that he could not possibly have committed such an act.
However, it was not a bad thing after all because this new book looks a
lot better thanks to new material from the Internet.)
The beauty of the Internet, you just have to click on a button and the
whole world is displayed before your very eyes, both sound and picture.
Let us give it a try at this very minute at 04.00 AM, Sunday 2nd
September 2007, and see what Alex Jones is talking about!
Well, the first two articles are blood curdling:
1. “Marine tells of order to execute Haditha women and children”
2. “Porter: Kill More Iraqis or Pay $9 per Gallon”
Now, let us check the Email box! This is the last one received.
Information Clearing House Newsletter (Pr Michel Chossudovsky)
Exposed: Pentagon's plan for Iran attack 09/01/07
Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered Since The U.S. Invaded Iraq 1,028,907
Cost of U.S. War and Occupation of Iraq $447,884,620,921
This is what we call history in the making and it is
frightening – global plunder and genocide after genocide, endless lies
and deception, and who is behind them? Is this the kind of world we
really want for our children?
END OF CHAPTER ONE
Sunday 2nd September 2007
Chapter Two will deal with David Icke : “THE DELUSION OF A MODERN PROPHET”.
