MOON LANDING HOAX BY BART SIBREL INTERVIEWED BY HEALTH RANGER REPORTER MIKE ADAMS

 

Bart SIBREL

Interview with Bart Sibrel on US government's LAME, faked Apollo mission theater

5180 views

Health Ranger Report - MIKE ADAMS

 https://www.brighteon.com/b0860e21-9a44-47d7-8886-c7bba932f82f

 Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer, and investigative journalist, who has been producing television programs, documentaries, music videos, TV commercials, and stage plays for over thirty-five years, starting at the age of eighteen, hosting his own television talk show. Sibrel has owned five video production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks, worked as a television news reporter, and produced videos shown on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, TLC, USA, and BET. Sibrel has also appeared as a seasoned actor on the stage and screen over five hundred times. Articles featuring Sibrel's films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and USA Today. His awards from the American Motion Picture Society include Best Cinematography, Best Editing, and Top Ten Director.

Sibrel grew up as the biggest fan of the purported "moon landings", yet gradually began to recognize their unfortunate falsification. In Sibrel's mind, as well as many others, the claim that NASA walked on the moon on the very first attempt with 1960's technology, which only had one-millionth the computing power of a cell phone, when today with five decades of better technology NASA can only send astronauts one-thousandth the distance to the moon, simply defies logic. Sibrel believes that a religious attachment to the emotional event is what prevents people from waking up to the deplorable reality.

Bart Sibrel has appeared as guest commentator about the moon landing fraud and to discuss his films “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” and “Astronauts Gone Wild” on NBC, FOX, CNN, HBO, Geraldo, The Daily Show, The Abrams Report, and Coast to Coast. In his memoir Moon Man Bart Sibrel reveals, for the very first time, the official CIA code name for the real Apollo project, the military base where the first staged "moon landing" was filmed, and the names of fifteen United States government scientists and officials who were in attendance for the first moon landing falsification, some of whom are still alive today. This information was given to Sibrel by the Chief of Security of this secretive military base, who confessed his regrettable participation in this government fraud on his deathbed.

Moon Man also reveals Bart Sibrel's real-life espionage adventures investigating the CIA's greatest secret, including his discovery of privately recorded audio of an astronaut plotting Sibrel's assassination by the CIA, which would not be necessary if they really went to the moon. Bart Sibrel is convinced that until the moon landing fraud is exposed, all the governments of the world will continue to rob the people under their care of not only the truth, yet also of their hard earned money, which continues to this day to finance their own deception.

Contact Bart - BartSibrel@yahoo.com

Follow Bart On: Brighteon | Odysee | YouTube

 

Sibrel.com

MOON MAN - VIDEO LINKSABOUT + CONTACTWORLD NEWS MORE . . . Bart's Email List Bart's Bible Blessings - Videos Bart's Bible Blessings - Bible Studies Bart's Game SEVEN

 

We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle

Bill Kaysing

 

THE APOLLO MOON HOAX: HOW DID THEY DO IT?: A Generation Deceived by NASA

Trevor Weaver

 

The Apollo Moon Missions Part II: Hiding a Hoax in Plain Sight
Randy Walsh
1. 

   The Apollo Moon Missions: Hiding a Hoax in Plain Sight (Part)

   Randy Walsh

 

Bart SIBREL

 Moon Man: The True Story of a Filmmaker on the CIA Hit List Paperback – September 11, 2021

 Top reviews from the United States

Z8

5.0 out of 5 stars Irrefutable Proof The Landings Were Faked

Reviewed in the United States on September 17, 2021

Verified Purchase

As a 24 year USAF veteran, I wish it were not so. Bart provides so much proof the landings were faked, it is overwhelming. In a way, after of 50 years of inability to return to the Moon, it seems more implausible that we were able to go--six times on a slide rule--than these events simply being staged.

After following Bart's evidence to the logical conclusion, I find that even more smoking guns emerge. The fact is, this was hard if not impossible to fake, and NASA, surprisingly, perhaps because they were rushed, did a poor job faking the missions. There are astonishing mistakes. Bart does an excellent job documenting a large number of mistakes, but there are more.

A handful of problems that I find impossible to dismiss are listed, below. Some follow Bart's revelations a little farther, and a few are different.

1. No gravity on the trip to the Moon and back. As an Aerospace Engineer and USAF pilot for 20+ years, I do understand the physics of weightlessness in orbit. Apparently, the orchestrators of these missions missed that class. Namely, that weightlessness only occurs in planetary orbit, it is an artifact of falling at the same speed as the curvature of the planet, below, falls away from you. The typical classroom thought experiment envisions shooting a canon. The farther you shoot, the farther the shell travels as it falls. If you shoot far enough, you'll actually hit yourself, as the shell circles the Earth. Shoot even farther and it'll complete more than one orbit. Shoot at just the right rate, and the shell will fall at the exact rate the Earth's surface curves away, and the shell will go into orbit. That constant falling is why an orbiting spacecraft feels "weightless." But on a trip, radially away from Earth toward the Moon, the astronauts will absolutely feel some weight. Yet, Aldrin does several experiments demonstrating weightlessness, half way between the Earth and Moon, even showing the Earth as a full globe out the window which Bart beautifully debunks as a portion of the Earth's surface, filmed while in orbit, shaped by the circular port hole window. The demonstration of weightlessness actually proves the astronauts were in Earth orbit, not half way to the Moon. The weightless experiments, broadcast on live TV, do prove beyond ANY doubt the missions were fraudulent.

2. Related to 1. Because NASA decided to use a simple optical trick to make the Earth look far away while actually in orbit (by moving the camera back from the circular window, as Bart proves with uncovered film of the astronauts discussing the illusion), something impossible is recorded for all of posterity. This is another, indisputable, smoking gun, and its on NASA's own film reels for all to see. Bart ingeniously points out their "round Earth" is just a view through a "soda straw" of the port hole window. But this method has a major flaw, it takes a small circular portion of the Earth's surface, and presents it as the full diameter. Back then, we didn't routinely see satellite views of the entire diameter of the Earth, but today, it's commonplace. We now understand that the largest storms are around 200 miles wide, compared to the Earth's 8,000 mile diameter. Tiny, by comparison.

Sure enough, the actual Apollo 11 film footage from this event shows single clouds spanning the entire diameter of the Earth, an absurd image for today's satellite-savvy audience to swallow. Specifically, there is a V shaped cloud that spans the entire planetary diameter. Utterly impossible, and it proves Bart is right, this is a fraud, without any doubt. Whatsoever.

You can see the footage of the astronauts discussing the fake on Bart's links, which he provides in the book. Better still, you can see the resulting NASA high res film footage of the fake globe with 8,000 mile long clouds by searching:

"Apollo 11 - Unscheduled TV - 010:32:36 GET"

I could go on, and on, and on, and on, with hundreds more inexcusable errors illuminated by Bart and others. But just a few more:

3. The lack of a blast crater under the Lunar Lander after it fired its 10,000 lb rocket motor directly into the dust caked Moon surface from just a few feet away. On the Moon, that's almost 2,000 lbs of raw thrust, the same as a supersonic T-38 jet engine, at full power, pointed straight down into dust/regolith, dust that the astronauts later kick around like sand on a beach. Absurd. Imagine pointing a supersonic jet's engine straight into sand on a beach at point blank range. Now do it with 5/6ths less gravity, without disturbing a single grain of sand.

4. The Lunar Module landing film's lack of communication delay. Search:

"Apollo 11 landing from PDI to Touchdown"

For a short time, when communications get heated, the time delay between Houston and the Lander, caused by relatively slow radio waves traveling 220,000 miles at the speed of light's tortoise-like 186,000/second, completely disappears. They talk and respond like they are next door.

5. As a former USAF pilot, I know how hard manual aircraft rejoins are, finding, then joining two aircraft in formation. Its a skill that takes many years to develop and master. Joining the Lunar module with the Lunar Orbiter, using launch timing from a wind-up wrist watch, at 4000 mph, in the vastness of space, visually, from an entirely unknown launch angle based on how the lander settled, with no horizon reference, no air to brake you, with very limited miniature thrusters, in 1/6th gravity, is BEYOND ridiculous. Six times, without a hitch. No.

6. Better communication clarity than my cell phone, from the Moon. Sprint has a lot to learn. NASA was used to corded phone lines, they had no idea how hard it would be to call someone wirelessly, crystal clearly, even on our own planet.

And of course...

7. SpaceX blowing up hundreds of rockets trying to land on their tail using super computers, high speed GPS tracking, and ring laser gyro stabilization, inputting thousands of computer calculated corrections per second. Its very hard to do with todays technology. But Armstrong did it, fully manually, in a totally unfamiliar gravity paradigm... first try. As did every other Apollo mission. No. Sorry. We know better, now. SpaceX isn't THAT incompetent (although they have asked for 8 years more time to (re)invent a super simple Lunar Lander).

8 through n... Bart shows the depressing behavior of the post mission astronauts press events, their unanimous inability to remember if they could see stars from the Moon's surface, their complete unfamiliarity with the Van Allen problem, so many photos with major problems, the ability of film to survive +220F, -220F temperatures and the unshielded radiation of space, surviving the hail of 25,000 mph micrometeorites on the Moon's fully unprotected surface, the lack of any bad photos with manual focus-aperture-shutter speed and no viewfinder, orange juice literally squirting through the vacuum of space, puffs of wind waving the flag on the Moon as an astronaut runs a bit too close, visible oil leaks from the rover's wheel hubs in a vacuum, and Moonscapes that can now be overlayed, using modern tools like Photoshop, to reveal the base photos were reused across different Apollo missions' landing sites.

In the bitter end, it's not hard to conclude the missions weren't real, sadly, the opposite is true.

So, THANK YOU, Bart Sibrel, for exposing the worst lie in human history. It takes incredible moral strength, and thanks to you, we now understand what our government is capable of. The only question remaining in my mind is... was it a well intentioned lie, or a petty heist of $150 billion dollars. I wonder what the original outspoken skeptics: Grissom, White, and Chaffee, would say?

Read less

88 people found this helpful

 

AFrayedKnott

5.0 out of 5 stars No amount of belief can make something true

Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2021

Verified Purchase

Bart Sibrel takes you on a harrowing tale of missing brake fluid, loudly humming phones, faceless foes as well as friends. Betrayals bewilderments and a Bonzi breakout complete with barbed wire topped fences, muddy creeks and kindnesses of strange as well as strangers.
I found this book quite the page turner. I drank in the 12 chapters in 3 1/2 hours. My favorite part is the supportive emails Bart included . I really liked the one on pg 164.
Sibrel flexes his formidable ability of logic and casts damning, extremely serious doubt upon the alleged moon landings. He then offers proof which SLAMS the door on all doubt.
Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins footage they shot in the capsule, "halfway" to the moon, changed the life forever, of the man who discovered it.
Sibrels book reinforces the fact that no amount of belief can make something true. I commend and applaud Bart Sibrels courage to bring the Apollo deception to light in exposing the guilty. HE NAMES NAMES!! PLACES!! DATES AND TIMES!! Abby Hoffman had us to steal his book, Bart would have you purchase his at a very reasonable price. Yet the information contained in it has cost many many lives. Sibrels Moon Man is a page turner, edge of your seat experience, shrieking truth and logic in every paragraph.
This book earned my highest recommendation.

Read less

24 people found this helpful

 

 

Bart Sibrel

Bart Winfield Sibrel is a Nashville, Tennessee-based filmmaker who advances ... that the sixApollo Moon landings between 1969 and 1972 were hoaxes. He has filmed two documentaries on the subject: 

 

 A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and Astronauts Gone Wild 

Dealings with Apollo astronauts

Most astronauts have refused to grant him interviews. The most infamous incident involved Apollo 11 crew member Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon. According to Aldrin, he was lured to a Beverly Hills hotel under the pretext of an interview on space for a Japanese children's television show. When he arrived, Aldrin claims Sibrel was there demanding that he swear on a Bible that he had walked on the moon. When Aldrin refused, Sibrel called him a "coward", a "liar", and a "thief".

[1]

An exasperated Aldrin punched Sibrelin in the jaw, which was recorded. Sibrel later attempted to use the tape to convince police and prosecutors that he was the victim of an assault. However, it was decided that Aldrin had been provoked, and, based on Sibrel's unfazed, nearly instant reaction to his cameraman, did not actually injure Sibrel, so no charges were filed. Many talk showsaired the clip, making Sibrel the butt of jokes.

[2]

Sibrel said later (?) that he wrote a letter of apology to Aldrin.

[3]

 

Claims

In the 2001 documentary,

 A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, Sibrel made several claims that hebelieved show that the Apollo Moon Landings were faked.Sibrel displayed footage which he claimed was accidentally sent to him from NASA, which, according to Sibrel, wasevidence that the Apollo 11 astronauts were staging shots of the Earth to make it appear that the spacecraft was

enroute

to the moon when Sibrel believes it was still in low Earth orbit.

[4]

 

[5]

Those defending Project Apollo state the"secret" NASA footage Sibrel uses is actually widely available and merely shows the astronauts practicing for an upcoming live telecast.

[6]

Sibrel believes that the technology of the United States during the era was behind that of the Soviet Union. He points to a supposed "five-to-one superiority" in man-hours in space held by the Soviets over the US as well as highlightingseveral Soviet space firsts.

[7]

The veracity of the "five-to-one" figure has been challenged (?) by the Clavius website, which is dedicated to the debunking of the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations stating that the Americans had a clear lead in man-hours in space by the time Apollo 11 was launched.

[8]

He has also stated the life-threatening events that occurred during the Apollo 13 mission were actually manufacturedby the government to force people to pay attention to the space program.Bart Sibrel also participated in the controversial Fox Television Network special,

Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? 

 

In it, Sibrel stated that, "I'd bet my life that we never went to the Moon."

 

Criticism

(LIAR) Jim McDade, writing in the Birmingham News, characterized A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon as "full of falsehoods, innuendo, strident accusations, half-truths, flawed logic and premature conclusions." According to (LIAR) McDade, the "only thing new and weird" in the 47-minute film is that the claim that video views of Earth were actually filmed through a small hole to give the impression that Apollo 11 was not in low Earth orbit. "Bart has misinterpreted things that are immediately obvious to anyone who has extensively read Apollo history and documentation or anyone who has ever been inside an Apollo Command Module or accurate mockup," says (LIAR) McDade.