Friday, 24 September 2021

NASA ACTORS ARE SIMILAR TO THE WHO-GATES 201 PLANDEMIC COVID-19 BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS MERCENARIES!!!

 

   Pr. Roger Garaudy "FOR AN ISLAM (FIQH)

                   OF THE XXTH CENTURY"

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffliCP2dU0&t=0s

 NASA ACTORS ARE SIMILAR TO THE WHO-GATES 201 PLANDEMIC COVID-19 BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS MERCENARIES!!!

Check out our hard-hitting interviews and news items at the main page for The French Connection [Because of the Rothschild Judaic-Apartheid Israel Lobby, The French Connections had to close down!

Slightly edited on 24 September 2021 (much of the material are not available on Google and Youtube or under different titles to be researched)

The Alien Beginning and End of Humankind

From Daryl's Encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

THE ALIEN BEGINNING AND END OF HUMANKIND 

By B.A. Frémaux-Soormally

  Mystery of the Rosetta Stone
Rashida (Rosetta) Stone
Discovery of scholar's notes shine light on race to decipher Rosetta Stone  | British Museum | The Guardian

The Rashida (Rosetta) Stone (part only) taken in 1899 from the town of Rashid (Egypt) by the invading French armies, later taken by the British invaders. In the “Demotic” section Arabic script is clearly visible. Abu Bakr Ahmad Ibn Wahshiyah (founder of the science of Algebra) was the first scholar to decode hieroglyphs, one thousand years before Jean Champollion according to Dr Okasha El Daly

KLM Travel Guide - The Pyramids of Giza and the Sphinx

Egyptian pyramid at Giza and the Sphinx

The 10 Best Aztec and Mayan Ruins in Mexico | Oyster.com

Aztec pyramid


Chapter One


THE ARROGANCE OF A PROMINENT SCIENTIST

BBC interviewer: "Is Evolution a Theory?" Pr Dawkins: "No, it is a fact!"

Oxford University Professor Richard Dawkins – UK


THIS IS YET ANOTHER VIEW OF THE RARELY TOLD “HISTORY” OF HUMANKIND. [To be reviewed!]


Addressing University students, Oxford Zoologist Professor Richard Dawkins [1941-….], an Atheist, Evolutionist and Humanist lecturer, stated once to a huge gathering of students (seemingly ready and willing to be indoctrinated) that the cleverest ape-man that has ever lived was Aristotle, a soldier in Alexander of Macedonia’s army, a man who never went to a real school (the first modern schools and universities came with the Muslims) and who spent twenty years learning “philosophy” while “walking with Plato”, and Pr Dawkins was seen on British television (where freedom of speech is absent) boasting that the “White European race” sprung from the Aristotelian racial lineage. If Irish George Bernard Shaw was alive today, he would have gladly given that arrogant Professor a piece of his uniquely great human mind, but any striving and tolerant Muslim (by definition, a Muslim is moderate and tolerant), have the duty to pray to God Almighty to guide the deluded Professor and show him the Light, although there is little hope that this may ever happen. His ape-man religion has been proven many times to be the fabrication of scientists lacking in honesty. The fact is that no indisputable trace of humankind or of its civilisation seems to have yet been discovered beyond ten (twenty) thousand years. Could we, humans, old pyramid (ziggurat) builders, have come from another far away planet or from another dimension or are we simply the recent product of an interbreeding with some extraterrestrial beings (the extraterrestrial gods)? Or are we simply the product of an almost impossible to fathom Creator?

A selected few, people of great knowledge, faith and wisdom, like Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Mark Hanson, a Greek Orthodox Christian reverted to Islam, and one of the brightest scholars in Islamic and human matters, a man who has attained the highest level of faith and spirituality, seems to have definite answers about God, Mankind, the world and its origins. Such great souls are convinced the world was created by design and that we were created human, while others like the Nairobi-born Zoologist Richard Dawkins maintain that all we see around us is just an accident of multiple evolutionary processes with no design and no purpose at all, and that we are only animals (rock and bacteria) that have evolved into humans in a world “of savage competition, ruthless exploitation, and deceit”. Of course this is not science but only the Professor’s atheist religion!


WHERE THERE IS GOD (invented or real, or what He represents), don’t we see more LOVE, hope, goodness, decency, cleanliness, charity, morality, patience in adversity, compassion, forgiveness, freedom, justice, mercy, and humankind as a also SPIRITUAL and HUMAN?


And, WHERE THERE IS NO GOD, don’t we see more HATE, inhumanity, evil, indecency, filth, greed and selfishness, immorality, perversions, despair, suicide, cruelty, vengeance, slavery, racism, injustice, covetousness, ruthlessness, ABOMINATIONS OF ALL KINDS, and Man as only material and only an (evolved) animal, an INHUMAN and monstrous being sprung from “thousands or millions of accidental genetic mutations”?


What did Karl Mordecai Marx himself, “the last of the great Jewish prophets” turned atheist, really mean when he wrote “religion is the opium of the people”. We witness rich and poor, black and white, scientists and poets, Atheists and Believers, good and bad people being addicted to religion, all kinds of religion, and not only the “vile populace” of indoctrinated beings (human sheep). Only by going beyond faith, that we can manage to understand much of what is happening in a world that belongs to the powerful, the mercilessly cruel, and the rich, and not to humankind anymore, not even to GOD. Sheikh Hamza Yusuf Hanson argues that if one believes in God, he or she is strengthened in that belief and God is then with him or her, but if someone does not believe in God, he or she is strengthened in his or her unbelief and abandoned by God. Professor Richard Dawkins drowns himself in an ocean of unbelief and pseudo-scientific beliefs when it concerns God. His opium is the religion of atheism and animalism (‘humanism’). Isn’t it a paradox that Atheists should call themselves Humanists when they believe and claim they are only (evolved) animals?


While the Greco-Roman Holy Christian Bible recognises Satan as the ruler of the world, Dawkins gives us a clue as to who now rule and should rule our world thanks to their “rebellious selfish genes” as tale-told by himself in his famous pseudo-scientific “thriller-manual-manifesto” (The Selfish Gene, 1976) in which he zealously defends the hoax (deceit) of macro evolution, and propounds his “fundamental law of gene selfishness”. Pr Dawkins is paid by our tax-money (with the full blessings of Queen Elisabeth II) to preach his fabricated religion of selfishness to our youth. According to him there is no Merciful, Compassionate, Generous and Just God, no Creator, but, instead, eternal selfish genes competing directly with their alleles for survival created man, and they are “naturally selecting” the best genes for survival, meaning the White European genes inherited from Aristotle, and he, Richard Dawkins, the disciple of the Selfish Gene-God, is one of the worshippers and defenders of Animalism and of western secular ‘democratic’ regimes.


Pr Dawkins would be one of those who survived this savage competition, which gives his “naturally selected” race the right to wipe out the 5-6 billion weaker “poorly-evolved animals” for his own survival. Although billions of people in such a materialist world find it more and more very hard today, due to western cultural and political oppression and terrorism, to believe in a real Invisible (Unseen) God-Creator, why does the Professor show such arrogance and scoff at others who are believers in God, whether He exists or not? His delusion (sickness of the mind) prevents him from seeing and admitting his own fanatical belief in the Selfish Gene-God, his opium! Even Atheists have their prophets like Sigmund Freud, his nephew Edward Bernays (who inspired Adolph Hitler, George W. Bush and other western fascist and Zionist regimes), Charles Darwin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and their likes. We are living in a society and a world where morality has been replaced by force by all kinds of perversions of mind and body, where the New Age religion with its Earth god aims at the breaking down of the family and the prostitution of men, women and children, the abduction of our babies to be sold into sex slavery (carried out by state-protected corporations to Israel and other western and western-client countries), the worshipping of money and fame, the poisoning of mind and body by drugs (including nicotine, alcohol and mainly Jewish owned pharmaceutical so-called medicine), Zionist television, pornography, and the complete control and dehumanisation of mankind. Those who resist the western military regimes and their allies are ruthlessly murdered along with their entire families by the Zionist New Secular (Talmudist) World Order, their countries relentlessly bombed and devastated, and their peoples slaughtered mercilessly, jailed, tortured, mentally and physically shattered, maimed for life and starved to death by the tens of millions. 

 

Richard Dawkins: EVOLUTION IS A FACT???

               THE LYING SCIENTIST!!!

 The Fact of Evolution

92,379 views
2 Jun 2011
1.5K282ShareSave
3.36M subscribers
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW1Lpa23mOw
 

 
New videos DAILY: https://bigth.ink Join Big Think Edge for exclusive video lessons from top thinkers and doers: https://bigth.ink/Edge ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can be committed to science, but as soon as you're committed to a hypothesis, you've walked off the trail of objective truth, says Richard Dawkins. For him, that is the mission of science and the purpose of the scientific method: these truths exist—they are the foundations of innovations like vaccinations, antibiotics, and space travel, because they are built on something solid: evidence. Einstein is known for highly valuing the role of imagination in science, and Dawkins agrees: imagination and intuition are the springboards scientific progress depends on—but when evidence refutes a hypothesis or a feeling, that's the end of the line. Dogged persistence doesn't get you any closer to the truth, says Dawkins, only critical thinking can do that. Richard Dawkins' latest book is Science In The Soul: Selected Writings of a Passionate Rationalist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RICHARD DAWKINS Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and the former Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. He is the author of several of modern science's essential texts, including The Selfish Gene (1976) and The God Delusion (2006). Born in Nairobi, Kenya, Dawkins eventually graduated with a degree in zoology from Balliol College, Oxford, and then earned a masters degree and the doctorate from Oxford University. He has recently left his teaching duties to write and manage his foundation, The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, full-time.  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
TRANSCRIPT: Richard Dawkins: The first chapter of 'Science in the Soul' is called 'The Values of Science and the Science of Values'. And it does, of course, give prominence to objective truth. There is a kind of whispering campaign—more than a whispering campaign, sometimes a yelling campaign—against the value of objective truth. Science, I think, is committed to objective truth; we’re committed to the view that truth is independent of the cultural background of the scientist, for example. So as I said in the book, an experiment done in a lab in New York can be replicated in a lab in New Delhi, and if it’s all done correctly in the same way they’ll get the same result. Science’s belief in objective truth works. Engineering technology based upon the science of objective through achieves results: it manages to build planes that get off the ground, it manages to send people to the moon and explore Mars with robots, and land robotic vehicles on comets. Science works. Science produces antibiotics, it produces vaccines that work. So anybody who chooses to say, “Oh, there’s no such thing as objective truth, it’s all subjective, it’s all socially constructed,” tell that to a doctor, tell that to a space scientist. Manifestly, science works and the view that “there is no such thing as objective truth” doesn’t. Science proceeds, I believe, in the sort of Popperian view that science proceeds by intuitive leaps of the imagination, building an idea of what might be true and then testing it by experiment, by observation, in the second phase. It’s a kind of Darwinian selection of mutation, which is provided by the imagination. So intuition is very important, but it is important that scientists should not be so wedded to their intuition that they omit the very important testing phase, and if their hypothesis is disproved they should regard that as a reason to reject the hypothesis or modify it, not a reason to just carry on doggedly sticking to the hypothesis because they are intuitively committed to it. The phrase 'critical thinking' is quite a cliché but it is immensely important. And so I think that I really could sum it up by saying what we need is critical thinking; we need to respect evidence, we need to respect the fact that the only reason to believe anything about the real world is evidence. The evidence must be assessed critically, preferably statistically and logically. You cannot derive truths about the real world by intuition alone, by feelings alone, by what feels good. People who say things like, “All opinions are equally valid,” or, “Well, it’s true for me, it may not be true for you.” Never tolerate that kind of thing. The only reason to believe anything is true is that there’s evidence, and everybody should either look at the evidence for themselves or they should trust that the person they’re talking to has looked at the evidence in a scientific, logical, rational,... For the full transcript, check out https://bigthink.com/videos/richard-d...
 

Tuesday, 26 March 2019

https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/2012/01/muslim-manifesto-strategy-for-survival.html

MY CHILDREN ARE NOT APES, LYING DOGMATIC SCIENCE, TOTALITARIAN SCHOOLS, USURY, VEGANISM, HOAXES, AND SPIRITUALITY.


  RICHARD DAWKINS THE LYING SCIENTIST!

MY CHILDREN ARE NOT APES!!!
  https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/2009/10/dawkins-has-taken-bait.html
"Evolution" is not science, but philosophy, dogma, religion, Satanic politics!  
PSEUDO-SCIENCE!!!

 School textbooks are filled with LIES!  
Gandhi, the British Pervert Puppet, called public schools CITADELS OF SLAVERY!!!  He did not send his children to ANY PUBLIC school!!! 

Jordan Maxwell - The United States is a Privately owned Corportation

Published on 14 May 2010
For the full video go to: http://www.newrealities.com/index.php... Maxwell goes into a detailed explanation about why the United States of America is a corporate entity and why states are countries and the difference between State and Federal ownership even when states are involved.

 ISLAM IS NOT A CORPORATION!

Jordan Maxwell -Maritime Law Rules the World Commerce and Courts




 Life, History, Science and Space with Eric Dubay
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9OugzIMjE8
 
Published on 1 Jan 2019


Thanks to Evita Ochel of EBTV for the wonderful interview covering topics ranging from spirituality and science, to health and veganism, to conspiracies and the flat Earth. 


THE ALIEN BEGINNING AND END OF HUMANKIND 


Friday, 23 March 2012 


http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/bafs-alien-beginning-and-end-of.html


 We, humans, evolved from Jack and Jill?


Dedicated to my children and grandchildren
To my very dear and faithful  friend Adalberto Erazo Jr.
And to all seekers of knowledge

From Daryl's Encyclopedia (updated 4 May 2013)
(Re-posted in 2014)

RE: OUTRIGHT LIES IN GCSE DOUBLE SCIENCE BIOLOGY
Yahoo/Inbox

CustomerAdmin <customerservices@cgpbooks.co.uk>

To:bafremauxsoormally

26 Aug 2005 at 16:53

Dear Basheer

Thank you for your email about our GCSE Double Science Biology Revision Guide.  

We're sorry that you are unhappy with the content of our coverage of the topic of "Evolution", however this book, like all our titles, is written to reflect the requirements of the exam specifications laid down by the exam boards who set the GCSE Double Science courses for GCSE - AQA, Edexcel and OCR.. 

Their remit is to reflect current scientific thinking in the GCSE course, which includes theoretical science such as the theory of
Evolution.  We aim to present the best possible revision material to
match the set course syllabuses in order to help as many students as
possible to pass their exams.  We do not set the course content, we
simply cover it as best we can.

We would therefore suggest that you refer any queries or comments about the actual content of the syllabus to AQA, Edexcel and OCR, since it is they, not us, who decide what goes into it.  You can visit their websites at www.aqa.org.uk, www.edexcel.org.uk and www.ocr.org.uk. 

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.  We welcome all feedback and we are glad to allow you a forum to express your views - though we recommend you now take the matter up with the relevant exam boards.

Kind regards

 Paul
CGP Customer Care
0870 750 1262
Ref:18304

-----Original Message-----

From: orders [mailto:orders@cgpbooks.co.uk]

Sent: 26 August 2005 15:01

To: CustomerAdmin

Subject: FW: OUTRIGHT LIES IN GCSE DOUBLE SCIENCE BIOLOGY

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Basheer Soormally

Sent: 26 August 2005 14:56


Subject: OUTRIGHT LIES IN GCSE DOUBLE SCIENCE BIOLOGY


 OUTRIGHT LIES IN GCSE DOUBLE SCIENCE BIOLOGY


DEAR SIR

HOW DARE YOU PRINT SUCH LIES ABOUT "EVOLUTION" IN YOUR GCSE REVISION GUIDE : FOSSILS, EVOLUTION, NATURAL SELECTION ? ? ?

 BAFS

Ex-Biology teacher
Head of Biology (TRINITY COLLEGE)
Friday 26th of August 2005

 _______________________________________________________

To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com


https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/2009/10/dawkins-has-taken-bait.html


The History of Flat Earth by Eric Dubay

 
 

Daylight Debunks the Globe

36,241 views
20 Sept 2021
3.7K169ShareSave
120K subscribers
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlNhPXCH5cA
 

Eric Dubay - Daylight Debunks the Globe

One simple and definitive proof that you are not living on a spinning ball orbiting around the Sun is the fact that daytime and nighttime never switch places as they must for the heliocentric model to be true. According to the globe doctrine, Earth makes one complete rotation on its axis every 24 hours, while simultaneously orbiting around the Sun and completing one full revolution every 365 days. If this was truly happening however, as you can see from the following image, the daytime and nighttime sides of the globe would have to flip every 6 months. For a more detailed illustration of this, imagine the Sun rising at 6am in New York on the Summer solstice. After 3 months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 90 degrees from its previous position and a quarter turn away from the Sun, meaning that sunrise in New York during the Autumnal equinox should now be happening at midnight. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be on the complete opposite side of the Sun, 180 degrees from its starting position, so that sunrise in New York during the Winter solstice should be happening at 6pm, or in other words, daytime and nighttime would have completely flipped from 6 months earlier. After 3 more months of 24 hour rotations, the globe would be 270 degrees from its original position, and sunrise in New York during the Spring equinox should be happening at noon. In reality, as you can test and observe for yourself, this simply does not happen and remains yet another nail in the globe's coffin. Globe apologist naysayers make either one of two ridiculous claims in an attempt to excuse away this clear problem in their model. Their first defense is to claim that days are not actually 24 hours long, but instead only 23:56 long, and this 4 minute difference per day fixes the math allowing day and night to flip. Now it is true that there are two kinds of days known as solar days and sidereal days, and sidereal days are in fact 23:56 minutes long, but solar days, which everyone on Earth sets their clocks by, are exactly 24 hours in duration. Sidereal days, which nobody sets their clocks by, are actually how long the fixed stars take to make one revolution over and around our Earth plane. As you can observe and measure for yourself, the constellations rotate just slightly faster than the Sun, so that they take exactly 23:56 minutes to come back to their starting point, while the Sun takes exactly 24 hours to come back to its starting point. Firstly, the fact that sidereal and solar days both exist and are not exactly the same duration, is yet another proof that the stars and Sun are moving and not the Earth. If the apparent movement of the stars and Sun was actually the result of us living on a spinning globe, as we're told, then there would and could only be one duration of day, namely, the amount of time it takes to complete one full rotation. The fact that there are two different durations of rotation time for the Sun and stars just further proves that they are moving at their own unique speeds over and around a motionless, fixed Earth. Secondly, if globe apologists want to claim solar days are now suddenly only 23:56 minutes, then why hasn't anyone in history ever noticed that our 24 hour clocks, which billions of people have used for thousands of years, actually fall behind reality 4 minutes every single day!? The reason is because it doesn't happen, and trying to claim solar days are the same duration as sidereal days just shows the disingenuous lengths these zealots will go to cling onto their false cosmology. Their next defense, even more ridiculous than the first, is to claim that the Earth actually must complete 361 degrees of rotation per day, and that that somehow makes up for it. They completely redefine what a "day" means and claim, instead of a day being one full 24 hour rotation of the globe as we have always been taught, a "day" now suddenly means "the amount of rotation until the Sun reaches the same point in the sky," which they say is approximately 361 degrees. With this excuse, however, new problems arise because the globe's supposed orbit around the Sun is actually elliptical, so depending where/when during its revolution around the Sun, the Earth's rotation on its axis would have to be both speeding up and slowing down at different times of the year just to maintain their new definition of what a "day" means. But of course in their own model, the Earth's alleged rotation never speeds up or slows down and remains constant always. They cannot have it both ways, but like the kid who wants to have his cake and eat it too, these leaps of logic pose no problem for the willfully ignorant. For the fearlessly inquisitive critical thinkers out there, if you still believe you live on a big blue marble spinning faster than the speed of sound, please find some time to watch our new feature documentary, LEVEL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wffli...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcZMPqvKi5E
 
Published on 17 Dec 2017

By far one of the greatest Flat Earth videos ever produced by Eric Dubay. I'm so glad I downloaded it months ago so that now I can re upload it so you can download it. Everyone share this and don't forget to help out Eric and subscribe to his channel. Eric Dubay: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffliCP2dU0&t=0s

Thursday, 8 October 2009

RICHARD DAWKINS THE LYING SCIENTIST AND FREEMASONIC ERASMUS AND CHARLES DARWIN 

https://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.com/2009/10/dawkins-has-taken-bait.html

 RICHARD DAWKINS THE LYING SCIENTIST!
I live in hell; I know what I am talking about!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JI1RBMZXJcU

English French captage 

Schiappa - Darwin - Mayottes - Police - Céline Dion 

Ben Halima Abderraouf

Published on 26 Apr 2019
contact benhalimaabderraouf.fr

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDPTtfExN-0

SATANIC TELEVISION BROADCAST "THE VOICE"

Confirmation donc, la théorie de l’évolution viens du Sataniste Erasmus Darwin Maçon du 33 ème dégré, repris par son fils Charles. cet théorie est issue des juifs naturaliste et d'autres sectes comme Rose-Croix, qui on tous un lien avec la Franc-maçonnerie moderne , La théorie de l'évolution n'est pas une découverte originale de Darwin. Il n'a rien fait de plus que de rappliquer une ancienne philosophie, La théorie de l'évolution matérialiste a été développée par les philosophes païens de la Grèce antique. Les premiers à promouvoir la théorie de l'évolution dans l'Europe moderne étaient membres de la société maçonnique connue sous le nom de rosicruciens. Ses membres étaient supposés posséder des connaissances secrètes. Mais le plus important héritage de l'ordre de la Rose-Croix est la philosophie naturaliste et l'idée d'évolution, dont elle fait partie. Les maçons déclarent que les racines de la maçonnerie remontent aux templiers et aux rosicruciens, en soulignant la philosophie évolutionniste de ces derniers. Cet penser matérialiste a crée de véritable monstre, et des guerre sanglante, référence a la révolution en France. C'est pour cette raison qu'ils faisaient du naturalisme la base de leurs principes et se sont fait connaître comme les "naturalistes" voilà d'ou viens cet idée d'évolution. Et cela peut venir que d'ibliss leur maître, car dans la franc-maçonnerie pour ceux qui savent pas 25 eme degrée : perversion de l'égalité 26 degré : perversion de la fraternité 27 degré : perversion de l' intellectualité 28 degré : Glorification du NATURALISME ! 29 degrée : Négation du créateur 30 dergré : glorification de l'hypocrisie 31 degrée : parodie avilissante de la justice 32 degrée : Parodie avilissante de la légalité 33eme degrée : glorification de lucifer [satan] On voit que tous est lié, et que cet théorie n'a pas été propager par hasard, et que beaucoup prétend être "scientifique" mais son en réalité de véritable suppôt du diable.

SATANIC SEXUAL EDUCATION IN FRENCH SCHOOLS



Quoted by MIKE KING:  
"Tesla on Theoretical Science: 
“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.The scientists from Franklin to Morse were clear thinkers and did not produce erroneous theories. The scientists of today think deeply 27instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."(4)"
 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkgMLKx7sd0

Episode 11: Forbidden History // Darwin’s Hoax of "Evolution"

Published on 14 Jun 2019

(Expand description box) -- Support “The Invisible Critic”

 http://tomatobubble.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/god_vs_darwin_2016.pdf

 MIKE KING

"Evolution" is not science but philosophy, dogma, religion, Satanic politics! BAFS


Destruction of the Theory of Evolution in 11 minutes by a world famous Geneticist.

Pr M. Giertych (Poland) 

Destruction de la théorie de l'évolution en 11 Minutes, par un généticien renommé mondial.

 


Pr M. Giertych (Poland)


DARWIN'S theory is NOT SCIENCE! In 5 minutes - Dr David Berlinski

147,746 views
19 Jan 2014
3.2K451Share
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIOIlCQDNgg
 

 
 "The fundamental claim of intelligent design is straightforward and easily intelligible: namely, there are natural systems that cannot be adequately explained in terms of undirected natural forces and that exhibit features which in any other circumstance we would attribute to intelligence." ― William A. Dembski, The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design Dr. Dembski has taught at Northwestern University, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Dallas. He has done postdoctoral work in mathematics at MIT, in physics at the University of Chicago, and in computer science at Princeton University. Dr. Dembski is a graduate of the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he earned a B.A. in psychology, an M.S. in statistics, and a Ph.D. in philosophy. He also received a doctorate in mathematics from the University of Chicago in 1988 and a master of divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary in 1996. He has held National Science Foundation graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. "Ewww... intelligent design people! They're just buck-toothed, Bible-pushing nincompoops with community-college degrees who're trying to sell a gussied-up creationism to a cretinous public! No need to address their concerns or respond to their arguments. They are Not Science. They are poopy-heads. There. I just saved you the trouble of reading 90 percent of the responses to the Intelligent Design position... This is how losers act just before they lose: arrogant, self-satisfied, too important to be bothered with substantive refutation, and disdainful of their own faults... The only remaining question is whether Darwinism will exit gracefully, or whether it will go down biting, screaming, censoring, and denouncing to the bitter end." ― Jonathan Wells, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design Jonathan Wells has received two Ph.D.s, one in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley, and one in Religious Studies from Yale University. Be honest. Have you personally examined the evidence about the identity of Jesus Christ and come to a thoughtful conclusion as to what this means to you? Your conclusion has eternal consequences. Merriam Webster defines: ex·am·ine (noun) : the act of looking at something closely and carefully ev·i·dence (noun) : something which shows that something else exists or is true con·clu·sion (noun) : a final decision or judgment : an opinion or decision that is formed after a period of thought or research truth (noun) : the state of being the case, fact : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality, a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality in·tel·lec·tu·al (adjective) : of or relating to the ability to think in a logical way : involving serious study and thought
 

Dr David Berlinski

 

 MUHAMMAD ALI BEN MARCUS: The Alien Beginning and End of Humankind by  Basheer Ahmad Frémaux-Soormally 2014

Margaret Temple (Maryam Noor) aged 65 - How I Found the Truth - SCOTLAND

[See also 19 July 2012 Truthseeker - https://www.truth-seeker.info/guided-atheists/scottish-atheist-lady-finds-islam-age-65/


Scottish Atheist Lady Finds Islam at the Age of 65

By Truth-Seeker Staff

Maryam Noor

Margaret Templeton who became Maryam Noor at the age of 65

My name is Maryam Noor, that is my Islamic name, and my original name is Margaret Templeton.

I was born in Scotland to a house which was atheist. In our house, we were not allowed ever to speak about God, and even if we learned something in school, we were not allowed to say anything or we would be punished.

For as long as I can remember, I have been seeking the Truth about why I am here in this world, what I’m here for, what am I supposed to do.

As soon as I became old enough, I began to search for some information about this “person called God”, that people mention, and all through my life, I have been seeking the Truth, not a particular religion. The Truth, something which made sense to me, something which opened my heart and which made my life worthwhile. I have been practically in every church in the kingdom, both here and at home, it never occurred to me to think about Islam.

I became interested in Islam, but the war took place in Iraq, and I read the terrible things which were being said in the papers about Muslims, but I was well educated about other religions to know that these things were not true, that lies were being told, and so I went seeking for a teacher who could teach me something about the Islamic way of life, so that I would be able to refute these things that were being said about Muslims which were wrong, which were lies, and which came from shaytan, or Satan as I called him then.

One of the things that I do is that I talk to everyone. I used to smile to everyone and say “Hello”, “How are you”, and “What’s your day like” .. as Jesus spread happiness whenever he was. At that time I was a Roman Catholic but I was very unhappy and I left the Church, and I didn’t know where to go.

At the same time, I was seeking for a teacher in Islam, I was praying constantly all day to God “Help … Help … Help … Help ..” over and over and over all day for almost two years, because I did not know what to do or where to go.

A friend of a friend of a friend brought me the name of an alim – a scholar. His name was Nur El-Din, and he was an Arab born in this country. He invited me to come to his house, which I did, and he told me what books to buy, and that I could call him if I had questions. And that was our relationship. There were seven volumes of this book, it was a commentary on the Qur’an, and it was excellent.

So I started to study. I opened the first book, I read the acknowledgement. I did not start from the back, I started from the front, and I was immediately in Al-Baqarah. And before Al-Baqarah, there was Al-Fatihah, and I read Al-Fatihah, and it was like I was struck by lightning, tears flowed from my eyes, tears like Niagara Falls. My heart beat very quickly, … I was sweating, I was shaking, … I was afraid this was shaytan, like he was trying to stop me because I might find the way, because this book might get me the way to Truth, which is what I was seeking.

I phoned the alim, he said come I want to see you. So I went to him in the depth of winter, and I arrived there like a block of ice, but a little suffering is nothing for Allah as I found. And I explained my experience to my alim. I said this is shaytan, what should I do? One of the things which took place during these tears was I saw my heart, I could see my heart out here, red, very large, rather bright, not shaped like it at all. I was rather frightened, and I said what do you think I should do?

And he said to me “Margaret” he said, “you are going to become a Muslim”.

And I said “But I am not reading these books in order to become a Muslim”.

“I am reading them in order to be able to refute the lies that are being told about the Muslim people.”

“I don’t want to become a Muslim”.

And he said “Well Margaret, you are going to become a Muslim, because I must tell you, there has been divine intervention in your life.” I was 65 years old. I am now 66. I have been a Muslim for one year.

I went on studying with the alim, from about November to February, and I could not wait any longer to do my shahada, and I asked him do you think it is too soon for me to come, because I really don’t want to become a Muslim, but I’m sure I will learn and God will forgive me that I had not appreciated this great gift that He gave me. I was not hateful of appreciating it, I was too small, too much a sinner, to appreciate this great gift that He gave me.

He said “Noor, come on the 11th. of February 2003, and he sat a bit far from me …, he was dressed in white from head to toe, and he said “Repeat after me” and he said the shahada which I repeated after him.

Then I said “What did I say?” and he told me in English what I said, and I said “Then I’m a Muslim” and he said “Yes and your name is Maryam”.

I can’t say that I’m a good Muslim as it is extremely difficult. I lost all my catholic friends, all the friends that I talked with. My daughter thinks that I’m crazy! My son is the only one who believes that I may have found the truth and he is the only one at the moment who may become a Muslim.

The second thing which makes my life very difficult is that I live in a secular world and not in a Muslim world and I want with all my heart to live in a Muslim world and to have a Muslim community. I’m the only Muslim in the area where I live. But Allah has been very good to me because amid all these difficulties, I’m happy, I’m studying.

I read everything in English because of my age, as I can’t remember the recitation so I use a book. And I ask Allah “Please remember Allah, the most Merciful and most Compassionate, that I’m really only a baby, but I’m a 65 years old baby and I have little difficulties and You must help me” and this is one of the ways He is helping me.

 

To watch Maryam Noor (formerly Margaret Templeton) relating her own story click the two video clips below…

But, millions other people do not go along with Pr Richard Dawkins’ animal ideology and choose to believe in a God or in many gods. Unfortunately, by their own fault, they do not have adequate armies to protect their beliefs and nations from attacks and destruction by the Atheist, Secular, ‘Humanist’ and Zionist New World Order super military powers. 

Of apparently intolerant Atheist parents, Mrs Margaret Temple of Scotland (above) found God through Islam (for others it is through Christianity or Christ) at the age of 65 in very mysterious circumstances, and took the Shahadah, the Islamic Testimony that there is none worthy of worship (no other god) except God and that Muhammad is His Messenger. When you sincerely and wholeheartedly look for God, you will find Him, so goes the saying. This is evidence that “God” (or a Godly inspired Arab, Muhammad) was right about the fitra (natural inclination towards Islam) He says in the Holy Furqân (Criterion) or Holy Qur’ân (Recitation) He had put at birth in every human being He had Himself created, and thus disproving the selfish gene fabricated by our learned but misguided and unscientific Professor.


On Saturday 26th June 2004 one Christian Cotten (chriscotten@wanadoo.fr) circulated an email entitled “A Story of Angels and of a Father : UNE HISTOIRE D'ANGES ET DE PÈRE by “Philippe” philippeplantey@free.fr. Is it a fabrication or a true story? One M. Lloyd Glenn (USA) rushed to the hospital to see his 3 year-old son Brian who was crushed to death by his automatic garage door. The boy miraculously survived and doctors confirmed that his heart and brain suffered no apparent damage. The near tragedy brought the whole family closer together. One day at home young Brian surprised his mother by addressing her using an unusually long sentence for his age.

Alain Soral with Christian Cotten

 

“Sit down mother, I have something to tell you. Do you remember when I was stuck by the garage door? You know, it was so heavy and really painful. I called you, but you could not hear me. I started crying but it was too painful. Suddenly the small birds came. They chirped and flew around in the garage and took care of me. One of them came and made you come. It came to tell you I was stuck by the door. They were so beautiful. They were all white. Some were white and green. They told me the baby will be okay, the baby lying on the garage floor. You went out, opened the garage door and ran to the baby. You told him to stay and not to go away.”


Kneeling by the side of the crushed baby, Lloyd’s wife had indeed said: "Don’t leave us Brian, stay with us if this is possible!”


Brian continued: “We have travelled very far away from here. We have flown so quickly in the air. They are so beautiful, Mummy! There are many, many birds.”


A three year-old boy was nearly crushed to death under an office partition glass panel weighing over 100kg, but was ‘miraculously’ saved from a certain death by a wall radiator. (Paris 1986)


Brian said the birds told him he had to come back to life to tell about them to everybody, and they brought him back home. There was a big fire engine truck, an ambulance. A man carried the baby on a white bed and he was told the baby would be okay.

Brian said the birds were always with us but we do not see them because we look with our eyes, and we do not hear them because we listen with our ears. They are all there and we can see them here (putting his hand on his heart).


Brian continued: “I have a destiny, mother. You have a destiny. Father has a destiny. Everybody has a destiny. We must all live our destiny and fulfil our promises. The birds help us to live our destiny and fulfil our promises because they love us very much.”


What is true, what is false? It is true however that God seems really a figment of our imagination, but does denying the existence of God solve the problem of millions of human beings who will never quench their thirst for the divine and the sacred? It is an established fact that millions of people, without having to be indoctrinated in any religion, thirst for God or for some kind of Providence – just like an addict for his opium. But, those who have lived miracles know the truth; a truth that intelligent people like Pr Richard Dawkins are unable to comprehend – the possibility of another reality. The “Heart”, not the mind, perceives certain truths. Pr Dawkins’ very existence is a miracle, but he refuses to be grateful to the One Who (might have) created him. Does God or angels exist or not? Many have known God, and seen angels, been with them, talked to them, been assisted by them, and saved by their belief in God, whether He exists or not, simply by their strong Faith in any deity whatsoever or even in any absolutely fabricating being. Hindus have been very well known to turn humans into gods. Christians have turned at least one human into God and another human into the mother of God. Hindus have millions of them, and do still believe in them and practice rituals even to this day every single day of their lives! Many lead quite a happy and peaceful life by being a Hindu.


Even the ones who claim to have had near-death experience and swear they have seen GOD, a male, white, blond hair and blue eye Jesus Christ or the “Mother of God”, a white, blond and blue-eyed female, “the Virgin Mary”, when they died have definitely seen and lived something wonderful and beyond description when they were certified dead clinically. But, what they saw was the fruit of their own imagination and beliefs. As a historian it may be completely out of question to believe in or rely upon such an unhistorical figure as Jesus Christ, but as a scientist why not? Jesus Christ was an Arab (Middle Eastern Palestinian) and cannot be as “Caucasian” as the White (rather Pink!) European Christians or the Black Africans have been made to believe for now two millennia. But, many people are sincere and have indeed experienced life after death, and seen and heard incredible things before they returned to their bodies. Although some stories are incredible to believe, like in Betty J. Eadie’s book “EMBRACED BY THE LIGHT” (Thorsons, UK, 1995) in which a woman saw the white Jesus Christ as the God-Creator, as One and at the same time as two separate Beings. One common thing to all these miraculous beings coming back from the other side of life is the message of love they bring us, but neither Dawkins’ nor his “selfish genes” can explain this human reality. Whether he is a myth or a real being, many lives have been saved from immorality and a life of crime and sin by the Jewish Jesus Christ, and by the love Jewish or Pauline Christians attribute to him.


Is there not more to man than Pr Dawkins’ “selfish genes” that are devoid of compassion, hope and a real sense of justice? There is definitely more to life and truth than what we perceive, see, hear, think and are made to believe. But, whatever the truth, it is beyond doubt that we, humans and animal-humans, the kinds that are ruling our world (reptilians would say David Icke) are all victims (or accomplices) of a an Elite that has taken over through bloodshed and extreme savagery the entire world with their headquarters in the United States of America, Britain, Europe, Eretz Israël and their satellites – the real Axis of Evil. Former US Attorney Ramsey Clark admitted that his country was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world”. US Pr Chomsky, Pr Howard Zinn and many other academics confirm this point of view.


Dr. KENT HOVIND challenged the world of scientists believing in and teaching the “religion of macro-evolution”. A few took up the challenge and failed, and the others ignored it.

“I have a standing offer of $250,000 to anyone who can give any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for evolution.* My $250,000 offer demonstrates that the hypothesis of evolution is nothing more than a religious belief.[36]

[36] ^ a b Hovind, Kent. "Hovind's $250,000 Offer", Dr. Dino.com, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-10-18. “

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8


When Pr Richard Dawkins was asked by a BBC correspondent to provide any proof for macro-evolution, he was unable to do so. When asked whether macro-evolution was just a theory or a fact, he answered it was fact. Coming from a man of science of such a reputation, Pr Dawkins should be ashamed to utter such a big lie. Whether Dr Hovind is right or wrong about his religious beliefs is not relevant here. The truth is that no evolutionists, including Pr Dawkins, have ever provided any scientific evidence to conclusively prove their claim of a theory that on the contrary has been proved to be a hoax by many. Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) in The Evolution Deceit, the Origin of life lecture by Dr A.E. Wilder Smith, the work of “Jehovah Witnesses” on the subject, etc.


“Kent Hovind had been charged with falsely declaring bankruptcy, making threats against federal officials, filing false complaints, failing to get necessary building permits, and various tax-related charges. He was convicted of federal tax and related charges, for which he is currently serving a 10-year sentence.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Hovind#_note-8


Dr Kent Hovind was jailed on 2 November 2006. Although very informative, the wikipedia article is very prejudiced against Dr Hovind both on the science side and the legal aspect. Arun Russo, filmmaker showed in his documentary Democracy to Fascism that there is no law that can force US citizens to pay income taxes on their wages. Jo Banister who used to work for the IRS (US Inland Revenue Service), denounced the IRS as a fraudulent organisation. When victims of the IRS asked in Court to be shown the law, the Judge says: I do not want the Law in my Court; I am the Law!


SEVEN REASONS WHY A SCIENTIST BELIEVES IN GOD


The following article of Mr A.Cressy Morrison, former President of the New York Academy of Sciences first appeared in the Reader's Digest of January, 1948; then, on the recommendation of Professor C.A.Coulson. F.R.S., Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University (the same university where Pr Richard Dawkins teaches), was republished in the Reader's Digest of November, 1960. – It shows how science compels the scientists to admit the essential need of a Supreme Creator. But Pr Richard Dawkins chose not to admit this scientific reality.


“We are still in the dawn of the scientific age and every increase of light reveals more brightly the handiwork of an intelligent Creator. In the ninety years since Darwin we have made stupendous discoveries; with a spirit of scientific humility and of faith grounded in knowledge we are approaching even nearer to an awareness of God. For myself, I count seven reasons for my faith:-


First:


By unwavering mathematical law we can prove that our universe was designed and executed by a great engineering Intelligence.

Suppose you put ten coins, marked from one to ten, into your pocket and give them a good shuffle. Now try to take them out in sequence from one to ten, putting back the coin each time and shaking them all again. Mathematically, we know that your chance of first drawing number one is one in ten; of drawing one and two in succession, one in hundred; of drawing one, two and three in succession, one in a thousand, and so on; your chance of drawing them all, from one to number ten in succession, would reach the unbelievable figure of one chance in ten thousand million.


By the same reasoning, so many exacting conditions are necessary for life on earth that they could not possibly exist in proper relationship by chance. The earth rotates on its axis at one thousand miles an hour; if it turned at one hundred miles an hour, our days and nights would be ten times as long as now, and the hot sun would then burn up our vegetation during each long day while in the long night any surviving sprout would freeze.


Again, the sun, source of our life, has a surface temperature of 12,000 degrees Fahrenheit, and our earth is just far enough away so that this “eternal fire” warms us just enough and not too much! If the sun gave off only one-half of its present radiation, we would freeze, and if it gave half as much more, we would roast.


The slant of the earth, tilted at an angle of 23 degrees, gives us our seasons; if it had not been so tilted, vapours from the ocean would move north and south, piling up for us continents of ice. If our moon were, say, only fifty thousand miles away instead of its actual distance, our tides would be so enormous that twice a day all continents would be submerged; even the mountains would soon be eroded away. If the crust of the earth had been only ten feet thicker, there would be no oxygen without which animal life must die. Had the ocean been a few feet deeper, carbon dioxide and oxygen would have been absorbed and no vegetable life could exist. Or, if our atmosphere had been thinner, some of the meteors, now burned in space by the million every day, would be striking all parts of the earth, starting fire everywhere.


Because of these, and host of other examples, there is not one chance in millions that life on our planet is an accident.


Second:


The resourcefulness of life to accomplish its purpose is a manifestation of all-pervading intelligence.

What life itself is, no man has fathomed. It has neither weight nor dimensions, but it does have force; a growing root will crack a rock. Life has conquered water, land and air, mastering the elements, compelling them to dissolve and reform their combinations.


Life, the sculptor, shapes all living things; an artist, it designs every leaf of every tree, and colours every flower. Life is a musician and has each bird sing its love songs, the insects to call each other in the music of their multitudinous sounds. Life is a sublime chemist, giving taste to fruits and spices, and perfume to the rose, changing water and carbonic acid into sugar and wood and, in so doing, releasing oxygen so that animals may have the breath of life.


Behold an almost invisible drop of protoplasm, transparent and jelly-like, capable of motion, drawing energy from the sun. This single cell, this transparent mist-like droplet, holds within itself the germ of life, and has the power to distribute this life to every living thing, great and small. The powers of this droplet are greater than our vegetation and animals and people, for all life came from it. Nature did not create life; fire-blistered rocks and a salt-less sea could not meet the necessary requirements.


“Who, then, has put it there?”


Third:


Animal wisdom speaks irresistibly of a good Creator who infused instinct into otherwise helpless little creatures.

The young salmon spends years at sea, then comes back to his own river, and travels up the very side of the river into which flows the tributary where he was born. What brings him back so precisely? If you transfer him to another tributary, he will know at once that he is off his course and he will fight his way down and back to the main stream and then turn up against the current to finish his destiny more accurately.


Even more difficult to solve is the mystery of eels. These amazing creatures migrate at maturity from all ponds and rivers everywhere those from Europe across thousands of miles of ocean all bound for the same abysmal deeps near Bermuda. There they breed and die. The little one, with no apparent means of knowing anything except that they are in a wilderness of water, nevertheless find their way back not only to the very shore from which their parents came but thence to the rivers, lakes or little ponds so that each body of water is always populated with eels. No American eel has ever been caught in Europe, no European eel in American waters. Nature has even delayed the maturity of the European eel by a year or more to make up for its longer journey. Where does the directing impulse originate?


A wasp overpowers a grasshopper, digs a hole in the earth, stings the grasshopper in exactly the right place so that he does not die but becomes unconscious and lives on as a form of preserved meat. Then the wasp will lay her eggs handily so that her children when they hatch can nibble without killing the insect on which they feed; to them dead meat would be fatal. The mother then flies away and dies; she never sees her young. Surely the wasp must have done all this right the first time and every time, or else there would be no wasp. Such mysterious techniques cannot be explained by adaptation; they were bestowed.


Fourth:


Man has something more than animal instinct the power of reason.


No other animal has ever left a record of its ability to count ten or even to understand the meaning of ten. Where instinct is like a single note of a flute, beautiful but limited, the human brain contains all the notes of all the instruments in the orchestra. No need to belabour this fourth point; thanks to the human reason we can contemplate the possibility that we are what we are only because we have received a spark of universal intelligence.


Fifth:


Provision for all living is revealed in phenomena which we know today which Darwin did not know such as the wonders of genes. So unspeakably tiny are these genes that, if all of them responsible for all living people in the world could be put in one place, there would be less than a thimbleful. Yet these ultra-microscopic genes and their companions, the chromosomes, inhabit every living cell and are the absolute keys to all human, animal and vegetable characteristics. A thimble is a small place in which to put all the individual characteristics of two thousand million human beings. However, the facts are beyond question. Well, then, how do genes lock up all the normal heredity of a multitude of ancestors and preserve the psychology of each in such an infinitely small place? Here evolution really begins at the cell, the entity that holds and carries genes. How a few million atoms, locked up as an ultra microscopic gene, can absolutely rule all on earth is an example of profound cunning and provision that could emanate only from a Creative Intelligence no other hypothesis will serve.


Sixth:


By the economy of nature, we are forced to realise that only infinite wisdom could have foreseen and prepared with such astute husbandry.


Many years ago a species of cactus was planted in Australia as a protective fence. Having no insect enemies in Australia the cactus soon begun a prodigious growth; the alarming abundance persisted until the plants covered an area as long and wide as England, crowding inhabitants out of the towns and villages, and destroying their farms. Seeking a defence, the entomologists scoured the world; finally they turned up an insect, which exclusively feeds on cactus, and would eat nothing else. It would breed freely too; and it had no enemies in Australia. So, animal soon conquered vegetable and today the cactus pest has retreated, and with it all but a small protective residue of the insects enough to hold the cactus in check forever.


Such checks and balances have been universally provided. Why have not fast-breeding insects dominated the earth? Because they have no lungs such as man possesses; they breathe through tubes. But, when insects grow large, their tubes do not grow in ratio to the increasing size of the body. Hence, there has never been an insect of great size; this limitation on growth has held them all in check.


If this physical check had not been provided, man could not exist. Imagine meeting a hornet as big as a lion!


Seventh:


The fact that man conceives the idea of God is in itself a unique proof.

The conception of god rises from a divine faculty of man, unshared with the rest of our world the faculty we call imagination. By its power, man and man alone can find the evidence of things unseen. The vista that power opens up is unbounded; indeed, as man is perfected, imagination becomes a spiritual reality. He may discern in all the evidence of design and purpose, the great truth that heaven is everywhere and in everything, but nowhere so close as in our hearts.


It is scientifically as well as imaginatively true; in the words of the psalmist: “ The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament sheweth His handiwork.”


A. Cressy Morrison

Former President of the New York Academy of Sciences


From “GOD OF ISLAM” by Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi, revised edition published by World Organization for Islamic Services, 1978/1398, Tehran, IRAN. A previous edition was distributed free 1971-1974 by the author who was then the head of the UNIVERSAL SOCIETY OF ISLAM at both People’s & Trinity Colleges, Mauritius,.


But, whether there is a God or not, whether we are mere evolved animals or humans don’t we have to get out of the mess our predecessors have put us into? But, the big question is how?


Is it possible to get out the clutches of the military state system called democracy? Democracy is evil mediacracy according to many US personalities, and always ends up in dictatorship, according to Baptist Christian Evangelist Dr Kent Hovind, as it has done now in the USA, Canada, Australia, and in Europe – all white supremacist regimes, according to Alex Jones, Aaron Russo (Democracy to Fascism), David Icke (Democracy or Fascism), Pr Noam Chomsky (US Fascism), and many others.


Is it possible to get out of the mind controlled and centralised system of government that has replaced all the gods? Fascism is racism. Military Zionism is Nazism, racism and Fascism, all in one. Karl Marx predicted Jews would one day take over the whole world and be the supreme masters.


Is it possible to get back our liberties taken away by the state terrorist religion? Atheist hegemony is evil.


Is it possible to get rid of the fascist military that has taken control of our civil life and liberties, that is scavenging our roads, micro-chipping our citizens, curtailing our freedom to circulate, running our governments, police, media, civil services and educational and health institutions, with the complicity of (paid by) the United Nations and big business corporations and the servile taxpayers themselves? We are not eternal sheep that the Élite can take to the slaughterhouse without some of us standing up and putting up a fierce fight or are we?


Is it possible to fight the religion of immorality and savage capitalism (pornography, prostitution, drugs, homosexuality, paedophilia, genetic engineering, wars of conquest, genocide, global slavery, political kidnapping and assassination, global immorality and planet pollution) imposed upon the masses by our controlled political, social and cultural institutions?


Finally, do we have the right to answer yes to these questions?


We have reached a stage in the evolution of mankind where even thinking has become a crime, where freedom of expression is curtailed more and more, and even hating the criminal deeds of a particular group is a crime.


(The first 800 page manuscript of this book was deliberately destroyed by an ex British soldier turned computer engineer and salesman while he had the author’s computer in for repairs, but the Chemsford Trading Standards concluded that he was too honourably known in Chelmsford that he could not possibly have committed such an act. However, it was not a bad thing after all because this new book looks a lot better thanks to new material from the Internet.)


The beauty of the Internet, you just have to click on a button and the whole world is displayed before your very eyes, both sound and picture. Let us give it a try at this very minute at 04.00 AM, Sunday 2nd September 2007, and see what Alex Jones is talking about!


Well, the first two articles are blood curdling:


1. “Marine tells of order to execute Haditha women and children”

2. “Porter: Kill More Iraqis or Pay $9 per Gallon”


Now, let us check the Email box! This is the last one received.


Information Clearing House Newsletter (Pr Michel Chossudovsky)

Exposed: Pentagon's plan for Iran attack 09/01/07


Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered Since The U.S. Invaded Iraq 1,028,907

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html


Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially acknowledged) In America'sWar On Iraq 3739

http://icasualties.org/oif/


Cost of U.S. War and Occupation of Iraq $447,884,620,921


This is what we call history in the making and it is frightening – global plunder and genocide after genocide, endless lies and deception, and who is behind them? Is this the kind of world we really want for our children?


END OF CHAPTER ONE


Sunday 2nd September 2007


Chapter Two will deal with David Icke : “THE DELUSION OF A MODERN PROPHET”.

 
N.B.iamthewiki does not exist anymore as the producer fell out with Daryl Bradford Smith!!!

No comments:

Post a Comment